Designing babies
By Staff,
The Economist
| 02. 21. 2025
One of the greatest scandals in modern science began with a late-2010s advertisement for HIV-positive couples looking to have children through in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). The ad had been put out by a scientist named He Jiankui, a biologist then at the Southern University of Science and Technology in China. Several pairs responded. For each couple, Dr. He and his team harvested their sperm and eggs and created embryos through IVF. He edited a gene in each embryo using CRISPR, then did something that had never been done before: had the edited embryos implanted into the women’s wombs. The gene, CCR5, is responsible for a cell-surface protein which plays a key role in HIV infection. A natural variant of CCR5 blocks production of the protein and confers protection against HIV. It was this protection that Dr. He sought to give the embryos.
In November 2018, just before the second International Summit on Human Genome Editing, MIT Technology Review reported both that the experiments had taken place and that two of the embryos had, when implanted in the womb, resulted in successful...
Related Articles
By Diaa Hadid and Shweta Desai, NPR | 01.29.2026
MUMBRA, India — The afternoon sun shines on the woman in a commuter-town café, highlighting her almond-shaped eyes and pale skin, a look often sought after by couples who need an egg to have a baby.
"I have good eggs,"...
By George Janes, BioNews | 01.12.2026
A heart attack patient has become the first person to be treated in a clinical trial of an experimental gene therapy, which aims to strengthen blood vessels after coronary bypass surgery.
Coronary artery bypass surgery is performed to treat...
By Staff, ScienceDaily | 01.05.2026
Scientists at UNSW Sydney have developed a new form of CRISPR technology that could make gene therapy safer while also resolving a decades-long debate about how genes are switched off. The research shows that small chemical markers attached to DNA
...
Following a long-standing CGS tradition, we present a selection of our favorite Biopolitical Times posts of the past year.
In 2025, we published up to four posts every month, written by 12 authors (staff, consultants and allies), some in collaboration and one simply credited to CGS.
These titles are presented in chronological order, except for three In Memoriam notices, which follow. Many more posts that are worth your time can be found in the archive. Scroll down and “VIEW...