Delivering Revolutionary Cell/Gene Therapies to the Underserved, Creating More Accessibility
By David Jensen,
The California Stem Cell Report
| 04. 24. 2023
What good is a “miraculous” cure or a revolutionary therapy -- which is the goal of a $12 billion state of California enterprise -- if it is not accessible to patients?
That’s a question implicitly posed by a former member of the governing board of that enterprise, the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), more commonly known as the stem cell agency. And he had an answer to the question and a suggestion for the state program.
The remarks come from Jeff Sheehy, who served on the board for 16 years beginning in 2004, the year CIRM was created. He sent the California Stem Cell Report a note after the publication of an article about CIRM’s $80 million effort to create a public-private manufacturing network to overcome obstacles to the production of stem cell and related therapies.
Sheehy spoke to the lack of availability of advanced medical care in underserved areas of California, many of which are rural and remote from the centers where cell and genetic treatments can be done. He proposed that CIRM develop a “capacity...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...