The CRISPR children
By Vivien Marx,
Nature Biotechnology
| 11. 24. 2021
Three years after the ‘CRISPR babies’ burst into the public eye and caused outrage, their fate remains shrouded in secrecy amid swirls of rumors. Many people contacted for this story refused to speak about the babies, who are now purportedly healthy toddlers. Some would speak to Nature Biotechnology only on condition of anonymity. Others believe that the unethical work conducted in He Jiankui’s lab at Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzen can be openly discussed without infringing on the children’s privacy and dignity. This could help the children and their parents plan for the future.
A full understanding of the health risks faced by the children due to their edited genomes may lie beyond the reach of current technology. But emerging knowledge on the potentially genotoxic effects of gene editing may help guide the children’s physicians about what to look for.
Born to an uproar
Three years ago, the world was in uproar after a journalist broke the news about two babies born with genomes edited with CRISPR-Cas9. He Jiankui had been invited to speak in the...
see more
Related Articles
By Lisa C. Ikemoto, Los Angeles Times | 07.07.2022
A few days after the Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade, Boston IVF, a fertility company with centers in six states, posted a statement that speaks to the havoc this decision will wreak not just for abortions, but for...
By Emma McDonald
| 07.15.2022
photo by Gayatri Malhotra on Unsplash
The Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson, which overturned Roe v. Wade, will have devastating effects on reproductive healthcare – something we are already seeing in states that moved to restrict abortion in the wake of the ruling. State laws banning abortion may also ban or limit access to reproductive technologies, including IVF, in addition to increasing surveillance and criminalization of healthcare providers and pregnant women and people.
Already, physicians, geneticists...
By Nairi Shirinian and Meghna Mukherjee, Ms. Magazine | 07.13.2022
It’s no coincidence that the world’s first IVF baby was born just five years after the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. IVF, or in vitro fertilization, is often mistakenly thought to be irrelevant to abortion debates. After all, people spend...
By Caroline A. B. Redhead, Jackson Kirkman-Brown, Leah Gilman, Lucy Frith, The Conversation | 07.04.2022
The UK government has just extended the period that gametes (eggs and sperm) and embryos can be stored from ten years to 55 years. While this change will probably be welcomed by people who wish to have fertility treatment...