Court to Consider California's DNA Collection Law
By Paul Elias,
Associated Press
| 12. 09. 2013
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — California Attorney General
Kamala Harris and the Obama administration are urging a federal appeals court to uphold California's mandatory collection of DNA samples from everyone arrested in the state as a constitutional and powerful law enforcement tool.
A specially convened panel of 11 judges of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal in San Francisco is scheduled to hear oral arguments on an
American Civil Liberties Union legal challenge to the collection. The ACLU alleges collecting DNA from all arrestees is an unconstitutional invasion of privacy because not all persons arrested are convicted of crimes.
At issue is a voter-approved law that went into effect in 2009 that significantly expands California's DNA database, which now contains some 2 million samples. The samples are compared to DNA evidence kept from long-ago crimes in hopes of finding a match. More than 10,000 suspects have been identified through the database in the last five years.
The 9th Circuit appeared on the verge of striking down the law after a first round of oral arguments last year. But before the...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Frankie Fattorini, Pharmaceutical Technology | 12.02.2025
Próspera, a charter city on Roatán island in Honduras, hosts two biotechs working to combat ageing through gene therapy, as the organisation behind the city advertises its “flexible” regulatory jurisdiction to attract more developers.
In 2021, Minicircle set up a...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...