Conflicting Views on a Wider Police Use of DNA
By Eli Rosenberg,
The New York Times
| 02. 10. 2017
The question of how widely investigators should be able to examine DNA databases is in the news, as officials in New York deliberate whether to authorize a method that could help find relatives of people charged with crimes.
Called familial searching, the technique attracted support after the murder of Karina Vetrano in Queens, a case that stymied investigators for months. Though a recent break in the case that led to the arrest of a suspect did not involve familial searching, the push for New York to join at least nine other states in authorizing the method has continued.
Familial searching allows investigators to look through databases with wider parameters to identify people who are most likely close relatives of the person who may have committed a crime. After a relative is found, investigators work backward to find the suspect. Many officials say familial searching is an important tool for solving particularly stubborn cases. It has led to arrests in cases like the so-called Grim Sleeper in Los Angeles. Ms. Vetrano’s parents, too, have advocated its use.
But the method...
Related Articles
By Pallab Gosh and Gwyndaf Hughes, BBC News | 06.26.2025
Work has begun on a controversial project to create the building blocks of human life from scratch, in what is believed to be a world first.
The research has been taboo until now because of concerns it could lead to...
Since the “CRISPR babies” scandal in 2018, no additional genetically modified babies are known to have been born. Now several techno-enthusiastic billionaires are setting up privately funded companies to genetically edit human embryos, with the explicit intention of creating genetically modified children.
Heritable genome editing remains prohibited by policies in the overwhelming majority of countries that have any relevant policy, and by a binding European treaty. Support for keeping it legally off limits is widespread, including among scientists...
By Ron Leuty, San Francisco Business Times | 06.16.2025
23andMe's two-step sale to a nonprofit led by former CEO Anne Wojcicki is nothing more than a dance around California's genetic privacy law, state Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a filing late Monday, one day before a judge will...
By Ed Cara, Gizmodo | 06.22.2025
In late May, several scientific organizations, including the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT), banded together to call for a 10-year moratorium on using CRISPR and related technologies to pursue human heritable germline editing. The declaration also outlined...