Conflicting Views on a Wider Police Use of DNA
By Eli Rosenberg,
The New York Times
| 02. 10. 2017
The question of how widely investigators should be able to examine DNA databases is in the news, as officials in New York deliberate whether to authorize a method that could help find relatives of people charged with crimes.
Called familial searching, the technique attracted support after the murder of Karina Vetrano in Queens, a case that stymied investigators for months. Though a recent break in the case that led to the arrest of a suspect did not involve familial searching, the push for New York to join at least nine other states in authorizing the method has continued.
Familial searching allows investigators to look through databases with wider parameters to identify people who are most likely close relatives of the person who may have committed a crime. After a relative is found, investigators work backward to find the suspect. Many officials say familial searching is an important tool for solving particularly stubborn cases. It has led to arrests in cases like the so-called Grim Sleeper in Los Angeles. Ms. Vetrano’s parents, too, have advocated its use.
But the method...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...