China’s ethics guidelines – A new era for human genome editing?
By Joy Zhang,
BioNews
| 08. 12. 2024
What do China’s new ethical guidlines tell us about the country's changing attitude to human genome editing? Professor Joy Zhang reads between the lines...
Recently, China’s National Science and Technology Ethics Committee introduced a new set of ethics guidelines on human genome editing (see BioNews 1247). The guidelines are at least the fourth national level iteration of China's ban on human reproductive genome editing in recent years (following its updates on the Crime Law and Civil Code in 2020, and the ethical review measures in 2023).
It is also the first major publication of the national Ethics Committee since its administrative function was revoked in 2023. Instead of being an ‘advisory and coordinating organ’ (yishi xietiao jigou) of the State Council, it is currently categorised as an ‘academic expert committee’.
As someone who has been researching China's life science policies, I see the new guidelines as a clear indication that the Chinese government is poised to enter a new phase of supporting human genome editing research. But questions remain about whether the latest guidelines will prevent past...
Related Articles
By Rob Stein, NPR [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 08.06.2025
A Chinese scientist horrified the world in 2018 when he revealed he had secretly engineered the birth of the world's first gene-edited babies.
His work was reviled as reckless and unethical because, among other reasons, gene-editing was so new...
By Susanna Smith, Genetic Frontiers | 07.28.2025
Key Topics
How does the American far right view genetics and genetic technologies?
What is the history of the American cultural pursuit of trying to choose smarter children? What has science shown us about the relationship of heredity and intelligence...
By Arthur Caplan and James Tabery, Scientific American | 07.28.2025
An understandable ethics outcry greeted the June announcement of a software platform that offers aspiring parents “genetic optimization” of their embryos. Touted by Nucleus Genomics’ CEO Kian Sadeghi, the $5,999 service, dubbed “Nucleus Embryo,” promised optimization of...
By John H. Evans, Craig Callender, Neal K. Devaraj, Farren J. Isaacs, and Gregory E. Kaebnick, Issues in Science and Technology | 07.04.2025
The controversy around a ban on “mirror life” should lead to a more nuanced public conversation about how to manage the benefits and risks of precursor biotechnologies.
About five years ago, the five of us formed a discussion group to...