Can You Pass the (Deoxyribonucleic) Acid Test?
By Center for Environmental Health,
Center for Environmental Health [with CGS's Pete Shanks]
| 03. 17. 2014
For just $99, genetic test company 23andme offered to test your DNA for everything from heart disease risk to your chance of going bald. Kira Peikoff wondered what DNA testing from 23andme and two other companies would tell her—and the results were surprising. We’ll also talk to geneticist Dr. David Ng. His story in McSweeny’s, “Congratulations, Your Ineffectual Genetic Test Results Have Arrived” pokes fun at the “direct-to-consumer” genetic testing industry. Then Dr. Stuart Newman fills us in on epigenetics, evolutionary developmental biology, and why the Lamarck versus Darwin debate may be old news. Finally, advocate Pete Shanks on the “promise” of GMO humans and the threat of techno-eugenics.
Check out this episode.
Download here, or subscribe via iTunes.
Kira Peikoff is an author and Masters student in bioethics at Columbia University. Her New York Times article in December exposed the fallacies of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (see more resources on genetic test companies below). Check out her debut novel Living Proof (and look for her upcoming 2nd novel in the fall) on her website.
David Ng is...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...