Can knowing you and your family may get Alzheimer’s ever be positive?
By Giulia Rhodes,
The Guardian
| 09. 21. 2015
Untitled Document
At the University of Washington’s School of Medicine there is a computer database that states with certainty – albeit heavily encrypted – whether or not Sophie Leggett will develop a form of genetically inherited early onset Alzheimer’s disease. But she has chosen not to find out what it says.
A blood test is available to adult children and siblings of those who develop Alzheimer’s at a young age and have a family history of the disease. It identifies whether they carry one of the three faulty genes known to cause familial early onset Alzheimer’s, presenilin 1 (the mutation affecting Leggett’s family), presenilin 2 and amyloid precursor protein. All result in the overproduction of amyloid, a protein that builds up into the plaques on the brain which are the hallmark of Alzheimer’s.
Now 39, Leggett saw her mother and aunt develop familial early onset Alzheimer’s in their early 40s – as had their father. All died in their 50s. There is a one-in-two chance that Leggett has inherited the gene mutation.
“I focus on the 50% chance that...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...