The Bleak New World of Prenatal Genetics
By Marcy Darnovsky and Alexandra Minna Stern,
The Wall Street Journal
| 06. 12. 2013
Four million American women are expecting a child this year, and many of them will encounter something entirely new in human pregnancy. Based on a simple blood draw at an initial prenatal visit, they'll be able to learn key genetic information about the fetus they're carrying—and face potentially wrenching decisions about what to do.
These noninvasive prenatal tests, called NIPTs, work by using a sample of cell-free fetal DNA circulating in the mother's blood to detect chromosomal conditions. The tests' most frequent target is trisomy 21, the genetic variation that causes Down syndrome in approximately one in every 700 births in the U.S.
Bioethicists, genetic counselors and advocates for disability rights have nervously anticipated the commercial rollout of these tests. Even—or perhaps especially—those who firmly support reproductive rights know that NIPTs have profound implications.
The tests have the potential to transform women's experience of early pregnancy, reduce the number of people with Down syndrome, and reinforce the assumption that Down syndrome is a dread disease to be prevented. Ultimately, these tests could dramatically reshape our understanding of what it means...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
By Grace Won, KQED Forum [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...