Banning Abortion in Cases of Down Syndrome: Important Lessons for Advances in Genetic Diagnosis
By Rebecca B. Reingold and Lawrence O. Gostin,
JAMA
| 05. 18. 2018
In December 2017, Ohio passed into law legislation that prohibited physicians from performing abortions if the pregnant woman’s decision was influenced by her belief that the fetus has Down syndrome. Physicians who perform abortions in these cases would face fourth-degree felony charges and revocation of their medical license. No other state bans abortion specifically for Down syndrome, but several ban abortions in cases of genetic diseases. Lower courts have struck down most such laws, holding they violate the constitutional rights of women. In February 2018, a federal district court judge blocked enforcement of Ohio’s law pending a final determination.
The Ohio statute raises compelling legal and ethical issues: Will it interfere with the patient-physician relationship and, in turn, the health outcomes of pregnant women and their children? Should women have to justify their reasons for terminating a pregnancy? The disability rights movement has challenged prevailing stereotypes and advocated for greater integration of persons with disabilities into society. Do these kinds of laws promote support for or detract from more inclusive, nondiscriminatory environments?
Down Syndrome: Current State of Knowledge
In the...
Related Articles
By Samuelle Fajutrao Falk , The Conversation | 06.26.2026
When my colleagues and I asked autistic people and parents of autistic children in Sweden how they feel about genetic research in autism, one response stood out: “I hope genetic research finds new ways to help us, not erase us.”...
By Julia Métraux, Mother Jones | 06.16.2026
"Robert F. Kennedy Jr." by Gage Skidmore via Wikimedia Commons licensed under CC by SA 3.0
On Tuesday, the Trump administration announced that it would move two key functions of the Department of Education—disability education oversight and the department’s...
By Elyse Betters Picaro , ZDNET | 06.13.2026
The kit arrives. It isn't big.
You get it out of the mailbox and bring it to your counter. It's printed in fun, friendly colors.
Swab. Spit. Prick your finger. Mail it back. Soon, you'll learn something new about yourself...
By Ed Pilkington, The Guardian | 06.12.2026
Desperate US parents paying up to $20,000 a session for a procedure scientists say could be bogus
Autistic children as young as 18 months old are being injected with human stem cells derived from umbilical cords in unapproved, unproven and...