Wider Debate Swirls Over Ruling That Curtailed Berkeley's DNA Program
By Josh Keller,
The Chronicle of Higher Education
| 08. 19. 2010
After months of debate, a ruling by the California Department of Public Health last week put an end to the most controversial part of a student DNA-testing project at the University of California at Berkeley, but now another debate has opened over how academic research will be affected.
Some researchers fear that the health department's position on the Berkeley project could have broader implications for academic research in California, limiting the conditions under which subjects of research studies could learn about potential health issues. Others say those concerns are unfounded.
Berkeley's plan to teach incoming freshmen about personal genetics by allowing them to obtain personal results for three genetic markers sparked a political firestorm. The program put Berkeley in the middle of a heated national debate over the ethics of personal DNA testing, driven by rapid scientific advances and the explosive growth of the personal-testing industry.
State lawmakers unsuccessfully tried to pass a bill to discourage the project, and advocacy groups and some researchers called the program unwise and potentially unethical. Last week, state health regulators said that as long...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Frankie Fattorini, Pharmaceutical Technology | 12.02.2025
Próspera, a charter city on Roatán island in Honduras, hosts two biotechs working to combat ageing through gene therapy, as the organisation behind the city advertises its “flexible” regulatory jurisdiction to attract more developers.
In 2021, Minicircle set up a...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
