Vertex Fails to Convince UK Watchdog of CRISPR Therapy Casgevy’s Value
By Nick Paul Taylor,
BioSpace
| 03. 14. 2024
A U.K. watchdog balked at the cost-effectiveness of Vertex Pharmaceuticals’ CRISPR-based sickle cell disease therapy Thursday, recommending against funding the treatment unless uncertainties can be cleared up satisfactorily.
The U.K. became the first country to authorize Vertex’s Casgevy (exagamglogene autotemcel) when the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency approved the treatment in November 2023. However, regulatory approval is just the first of two key steps to reaching patients in the U.K. Vertex must also show the therapy is cost-effective before it can be used routinely by the National Health Service (NHS).
The U.K. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended against the use of Casgevy in sickle cell disease in draft guidance. The therapy has a list price of $2.2 million in the U.S. but NICE’s guidance says the U.K. price is “commercial in confidence.” Vertex’s justification for the cost rests on the potential for a one-time treatment with Casgevy to provide a functional cure for sickle cell disease.
Currently, NICE’s cost-effectiveness estimate for Casgevy exceeds the threshold it normally views as a good use of the...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
By Grace Won, KQED Forum [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...