Vertex Fails to Convince UK Watchdog of CRISPR Therapy Casgevy’s Value
By Nick Paul Taylor,
BioSpace
| 03. 14. 2024
A U.K. watchdog balked at the cost-effectiveness of Vertex Pharmaceuticals’ CRISPR-based sickle cell disease therapy Thursday, recommending against funding the treatment unless uncertainties can be cleared up satisfactorily.
The U.K. became the first country to authorize Vertex’s Casgevy (exagamglogene autotemcel) when the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency approved the treatment in November 2023. However, regulatory approval is just the first of two key steps to reaching patients in the U.K. Vertex must also show the therapy is cost-effective before it can be used routinely by the National Health Service (NHS).
The U.K. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended against the use of Casgevy in sickle cell disease in draft guidance. The therapy has a list price of $2.2 million in the U.S. but NICE’s guidance says the U.K. price is “commercial in confidence.” Vertex’s justification for the cost rests on the potential for a one-time treatment with Casgevy to provide a functional cure for sickle cell disease.
Currently, NICE’s cost-effectiveness estimate for Casgevy exceeds the threshold it normally views as a good use of the...
Related Articles
By Rob Stein, NPR [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 08.06.2025
A Chinese scientist horrified the world in 2018 when he revealed he had secretly engineered the birth of the world's first gene-edited babies.
His work was reviled as reckless and unethical because, among other reasons, gene-editing was so new...
By Susanna Smith, Genetic Frontiers | 07.28.2025
Key Topics
How does the American far right view genetics and genetic technologies?
What is the history of the American cultural pursuit of trying to choose smarter children? What has science shown us about the relationship of heredity and intelligence...
By Arthur Caplan and James Tabery, Scientific American | 07.28.2025
An understandable ethics outcry greeted the June announcement of a software platform that offers aspiring parents “genetic optimization” of their embryos. Touted by Nucleus Genomics’ CEO Kian Sadeghi, the $5,999 service, dubbed “Nucleus Embryo,” promised optimization of...
By John H. Evans, Craig Callender, Neal K. Devaraj, Farren J. Isaacs, and Gregory E. Kaebnick, Issues in Science and Technology | 07.04.2025
The controversy around a ban on “mirror life” should lead to a more nuanced public conversation about how to manage the benefits and risks of precursor biotechnologies.
About five years ago, the five of us formed a discussion group to...