Uterine Transplants: A New Frontier in Science
By Shari Rudavsky,
Indy Star
| 12. 17. 2011
Researchers, including some from IU, are studying procedure than could benefit thousands
In the early days of infertility research, scientists -- flush with the promise of transplant medicine -- wondered whether replacing the uterus would help women who were unable to conceive. But less invasive treatments proved feasible, and such research fell by the wayside.
Now, a handful of researchers, including some at the Indiana University School of Medicine, are exploring whether uterine transplants might be able to help women who lack a womb to bear children.
Thousands of women could benefit, but practical and ethical questions remain. When should elective transplants be used? Is a mother's desire to carry her own child reason enough? How might transplant rejection drugs affect a fetus?
The hunger for answers is strong enough that an Indiana University gynecologist convened a conference Dec. 5 at which two dozen people, including international experts in uterine and facial transplants, pondered the next steps.
"This is the first time that I think IU has looked at this seriously," said Dr. Giuseppe Del Priore, Mary Fendrich Hulman Professor of Gynecologic Surgery. "It's encouraging that so many people think it's a...
Related Articles
By Courtney Withers and Daryna Zadvirna, ABC News | 12.03.2025
Same-sex couples, single people, transgender and intersex West Australians will be able to access assisted reproductive technology (ART) and surrogacy, almost a decade after reforms were first promised.
The landmark legislation, which removes the requirement for people to demonstrate medical...
By Rachel Hall, The Guardian | 11.20.2025
Couples are needlessly going through IVF because male infertility is under-researched, with the NHS too often failing to diagnose treatable causes, leading experts have said.
Poor understanding among GPs and a lack of specialists and NHS testing means male infertility...
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...