They advised federal health agencies on the ethics and impact of scientific research. They’re no longer wanted
By Megan Molteni and Anil Oza,
STAT
| 10. 07. 2025
For two years, a panel of scientific experts, clinicians, and patient advocates had been hammering out ways to increase community engagement in National Institutes of Health-funded science. When they presented their road map to the NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya last week, he praised it for addressing a top priority: rebuilding public trust in clinical research. Which made it all the more confusing to the assembled panelists that this meeting would be their last.
The advisory committee, NExTRAC, was established in 2019 to take over the work of a storied panel, the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee, or RAC. Starting in the mid-’70s, as the first genetic engineering technologies were being developed, RAC oversaw the rollout of synthetic insulin and the earliest days of gene therapy’s rocky entrance into clinical testing, laying much of the groundwork for its modern-day success. Newer biosafety and ethical quagmires, like CRISPR gene drives and novel uses of personal health data, have been the purview of NExTRAC over the past five years. But in May, members received emails from Bhattacharya notifying them that the committee was being sunset...
Related Articles
What We Inherit by Sam Trejo and Daphne O. Martschenko; and Original Sin by Kathryn Paige Harden have a great deal in common, with substantial differences in style and emphasis. Both books attempt, in different ways, to show the reader just where current research into human genomics stands, where that might be going, and why the authors are interested. In short, the influence of genomic research on our societies is already large and seems likely to change them in ways...
By Dan Falk, Nautilus | 08.20.2026
The pseudoscience of eugenics, founded on the mistaken notion that nature envisions some “right” combination of genes, and that selective breeding can improve the human race, is making a comeback. While the heyday of eugenics was a century ago, the...
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross, MedPage Today | 08.18.2026
Few things evoke a greater sense of desperation than a parent seeking an experimental treatment for their child. That desperation can make even extraordinary risks seem worth taking. This dynamic has come into stark relief after Mei, a 6-year-old girl...
By Ryan Cross, Endpoints News | 08.20.2026
China’s cheap, fast and quiet system for testing cutting-edge medicines is facing scrutiny after the deaths of three people in investigator-initiated trials.
The studies, also known as IITs, allow experimental cell and gene therapies to be tested without oversight from...