Suspects' DNA data plans changed [UK]
By BBC,
BBC News
| 10. 19. 2009
The government has dropped plans to give ministers wide powers on holding innocent people's DNA data on record.
The Policing and Crime Bill had proposed allowing ministers to set time limits on holding DNA but had not set out how long these would be.
Campaigners argued that such plans would mean less parliamentary scrutiny.
The government has dropped the proposals from the bill and says it will introduce revised legislation later this autumn.
The plans relate to people arrested for suspected crimes but never charged.
A European Court of Human Rights ruling last year said the policy of retaining all suspects' data was "blanket and indiscriminate".
'Victory'
Following this ministers proposed allowing DNA details to remain on the database for up to 12 years instead of indefinitely.
They had said this would happen via a parliamentary order - which would require a vote but would be given less time for debate than a bill.
When the consultation was published earlier this year, critics said Parliament needed a full debate on the issues surrounding how many people are held on the...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...