Stocking the Genetic Supermarket: Reproductive Genetic Technologies and Collective Action Problems
By Chris Gyngell and Thomas Douglas,
Wiley Online Library
| 04. 10. 2014
Various technologies already exist that enable parents to determine whether their future children will have or lack certain genetic predispositions. Pre-natal testing and selective abortion allow parents to decide whether to continue with a particular pregnancy based on genetic information about the developing embryo or foetus. In vitro fertilization (IVF) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allow parents to acquire genetic information about a range of embryos and then determine which to gestate on the basis of that information. In the future it may become possible for parents employing assisted reproductive technologies to decide which eggs to fertilize with which sperm on the basis of reliable genetic information about the available eggs and sperm.1 Advances in genetic engineering technologies could also allow parents to directly alter the genes of existing sperm, eggs, embryos or foetuses.
We use the term ‘reproductive genetic technologies’ or ‘RGTs’ to refer collectively to these technologies and to any other technologies that enable parents or others to (i) determine which of different possible future children to bring into existence based on detailed information about their...
Related Articles
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
By Lucy Tu, The Guardian | 11.05.2025
Beth Schafer lay in a hospital bed, bracing for the birth of her son. The first contractions rippled through her body before she felt remotely ready. She knew, with a mother’s pit-of-the-stomach intuition, that her baby was not ready either...
By Emily Glazer, Katherine Long, Amy Dockser Marcus, The Wall Street Journal | 11.08.2025
For months, a small company in San Francisco has been pursuing a secretive project: the birth of a genetically engineered baby.
Backed by OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman and his husband, along with Coinbase co-founder and CEO Brian Armstrong, the startup—called...