Social science: Include social equity in California Biohub
By Science FARE (Feminist Anti-Racist Equity) Collective: Jessica Cussins, Kate Weatherford Darling, Ugo Edu, Laura Mamo, Jenny Reardon & Charis Thompson,
Nature
| 10. 19. 2016
We have an idea for philanthropists Priscilla Chan and Mark Zuckerberg, who last month announced their first major investment in basic science: US$600 million for a Biohub in San Francisco, California.
They aspire to 'advance human potential and promote equality' (https://chanzuckerberg.com). As members of the Science FARE (Feminist Anti-Racist Equity) collective, we suggest that 5–7% of the Biohub's health-research budget should be used to design and monitor goals of justice and equality from the outset. Otherwise, social inequalities could limit the project's potential.
Innovative social scientists will need to work with bench scientists, engineers and clinical researchers. Health research should include trained people from all social backgrounds and a variety of disciplines.
The affordability of treatments and access to them is crucial, irrespective of class, gender, race or disabilities. Building equality into Biohub's founding architecture will allow it to be tackled simultaneously with disease eradication, mitigating the uneven social distribution of health care in San Francisco's Bay Area and beyond.
Image via C-Z BioHub
Related Articles
By Anna Collinson and Jo Adnitt, BBC | 08.18.2026
At least 30 children, most of them British, are feared to have been conceived by IVF treatment in northern Cyprus using the wrong sperm or egg donors.
In each case, the parents suspect they did not get the donors they...
What We Inherit by Sam Trejo and Daphne O. Martschenko; and Original Sin by Kathryn Paige Harden have a great deal in common, with substantial differences in style and emphasis. Both books attempt, in different ways, to show the reader just where current research into human genomics stands, where that might be going, and why the authors are interested. In short, the influence of genomic research on our societies is already large and seems likely to change them in ways...
By Dan Falk, Nautilus | 08.20.2026
The pseudoscience of eugenics, founded on the mistaken notion that nature envisions some “right” combination of genes, and that selective breeding can improve the human race, is making a comeback. While the heyday of eugenics was a century ago, the...
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross, MedPage Today | 08.18.2026
Few things evoke a greater sense of desperation than a parent seeking an experimental treatment for their child. That desperation can make even extraordinary risks seem worth taking. This dynamic has come into stark relief after Mei, a 6-year-old girl...