Sex Selection: New Technologies, New Forms of Gender Discrimination
By Rajani Bhatia, Rupsa Mallik, and Shamita Das Dasgupta
| 10. 01. 2003
With the advent of reproductive technologies that made it possible to detect the sex of a fetus developing in a woman's womb came a new method of discrimination against girls and women. Developed in the 1970s, prenatal diagnostic technologies like ultrasound scanning and amniocentesis proved profitable when marketed as a method of sex selection. Using prenatal diagnosis to detect sex, a person could choose not to have a child based on the sex of the fetus and opt for an abortion.(1) Availability of these technologies and their promotion as tools for sex selection spread fast, primarily in South and East Asia. Currently, they are the most commonly practiced method of sex selection around the world.
Where its use is most widespread, prenatal diagnosis for sex selection reveals clear discrimination against the girl child, leading to severe gender imbalances in the population. In India, for example, the 2001 census recorded a substantial decline in the child sex ratio from 945 to 927 females per 1000 males in just ten years. In urban areas the ratio declined even more dramatically...
Related Articles
By Carly Mallenbaum and Alex Golden, Axios | 04.08.2026
Without a federal law, surrogacy in the U.S. is governed by a patchwork of state regulations that can determine everything from whether agreements are legally binding to who is recognized as a parent at birth.
Why it matters: More Americans...
By Miguel Muñoz, Cadena SER | 08.04.2026
"Para ellos, una familia numerosa no solo es una preferencia personal, sino que es una obligación. Creen que tener tantos hijos como sea posible es necesario para evitar un futuro apocalíptico", aseguraba Xavier Orri, periodista y cofundador de Página Internacional...
By Mary Hartnett, WFYI | 03.30.2026
"1907 Indiana Eugenics Law" via Wikimedia Commons | CC by-SA 4.0
Indiana was the first government in the world to pass a eugenic sterilization law. The state sterilized 2,500 people from 1907-to-1974. Indiana apologized for implementing the program...
By Sarah Elizabeth Richards, Scientific American | 04.02.2026
For the past two decades, fertility specialists have wrestled with a troubling question: Why do Black people have lower live birth rates after in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment than white people?
Researchers have proposed several explanations, such as the fact...