Science in court: DNA's identity crisis
By Natasha Gilbert,
Nature
| 03. 17. 2010
When Peter Hoe was found stabbed to death in his home in North
Yorkshire, UK, in the afternoon of 13 October 2006, investigators were
able to connect the murder to brothers Terence and David Reed on the
basis of a small amount of DNA lifted from shards of plastic found near
the body. The men were convicted the next year.
But an appeal to the ruling heard in 2009 raised questions about the
reliability and interpretation of DNA profiles drawn from very small
amounts of genetic material, a technique known as low-copy-number
analysis. In the appeal, the Reeds' lawyers argued that Valerie
Tomlinson, an officer involved in the analysis at the Forensic Science
Service (FSS) based in Birmingham, UK, had overstepped her bounds by
speculating how the men's DNA came to be on the pieces of plastic —
thought to have broken off two knife handles. The appeal failed last
December, but a larger question looms about how suspects can be fingered
from such a small amount of DNA.
The case is one of the most recent public airings of...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...