Science in court: DNA's identity crisis
By Natasha Gilbert,
Nature
| 03. 17. 2010
When Peter Hoe was found stabbed to death in his home in North
Yorkshire, UK, in the afternoon of 13 October 2006, investigators were
able to connect the murder to brothers Terence and David Reed on the
basis of a small amount of DNA lifted from shards of plastic found near
the body. The men were convicted the next year.
But an appeal to the ruling heard in 2009 raised questions about the
reliability and interpretation of DNA profiles drawn from very small
amounts of genetic material, a technique known as low-copy-number
analysis. In the appeal, the Reeds' lawyers argued that Valerie
Tomlinson, an officer involved in the analysis at the Forensic Science
Service (FSS) based in Birmingham, UK, had overstepped her bounds by
speculating how the men's DNA came to be on the pieces of plastic —
thought to have broken off two knife handles. The appeal failed last
December, but a larger question looms about how suspects can be fingered
from such a small amount of DNA.
The case is one of the most recent public airings of...
Related Articles
By Jason Liebowitz, The New Yorker | 03.06.2026
When Talaya Reid was in high school, in a quiet suburb of Philadelphia, she developed fatigue so severe that she spent afternoons napping instead of going out with friends. She was lethargic at school and her grades suffered, but after...
By Scott Solomon, The MIT Press Reader | 02.12.2026
Chris Mason is a man in a hurry.
“Sometimes walking from the subway to the lab takes too long, so I’ll start running,” he told me over breakfast at a bistro near his home in Brooklyn on a crisp...
By Katrina Miller, The New York TImes | 02.05.2026
Joseph Yracheta: The Native Biodata Consortium is the first nonprofit data and sample repository within the geographic bounds and legal jurisdiction of an American Indian nation, on the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation in Eagle Butte, S.D.
NativeBio participated in a ...
By David Jensen, California Stem Cell Report | 02.10.2026
Touchy issues involving accusations that California’s $12 billion gene and stem cell research agency is pushing aside “good science” in favor of new priorities and preferences will be aired again in late March at a public meeting in Sacramento.
The...