On the scales: Social justice and pluralism in reproductive tourism
By Gina Maranto, Biopolitical Times guest contributor
| 02. 01. 2011
The term “reproductive tourism” first surfaced in Canada in the late 1980s as that country carried out an exhaustive survey of public opinion under the Royal Commission headed by Dr. Patricia Baird. The coinage was used to refer to the prospect that unless the government passed comprehensive national laws, women and couples unable to obtain treatments in their own province would seek them out in another. By 1999, Canadians were using it to talk about women who, when refused high risk procedures there, went to the U.S. instead. Today, borders are being crossed throughout the EU, where member states have quite different codes, among different U.S. states, and internationally.
In some quarters, a concerted effort has been made to rename the practice, giving it a less negative spin as “
cross-border [or transborder] reproductive care.” Some have also hyperbolically framed those who travel outside their own countries for reproductive services as victims of repressive legal systems, “
reproductive exiles” who take on added risks by traveling abroad, because if procedures go awry, they are unlikely to have ready...
Related Articles
By Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 06.04.2026
Scientists at Columbia University have edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented accuracy, an achievement that could open the way to babies engineered with particular characteristics.
The prospect has fueled controversy for years. On the one hand, the...
Faster, Higher, Stronger was the Olympic motto from 1874 until 2001, when “ – Together” was added, to stress the “moral and educational perspective” of the Games. The folks who paid for or participated in the Enhanced Games – the name itself a nod to the Olympics – held in Las Vegas on Sunday, May 24, apparently use a different edit:
Faster, Higher, Stronger with Chemistry
High-level sport draws huge crowds. Coming very soon, the soccer World Cup, featuring...
By Gina Kolata, The New York Times | 05.25.2026
In a small, preliminary study, an experimental gene-editing treatment dramatically lowered cholesterol levels, perhaps permanently, after just one infusion, scientists reported on Monday.
If confirmed in larger studies, researchers hope the findings may lead to a one-and-done way to prevent...
By Ryan Cross, Endpoint News | 05.20.2026
BOSTON — Over the past year, I’ve begun hearing rumblings from scientists who secretly think it’s time to stop being stodgy about editing the genes of human embryos.
For the most part, they are still too timid to speak up...