Regulating forensic genetic genealogy
By Natalie Ram, Erin E. Murphy, and Sonia M. Suter,
Science
| 09. 24. 2021
In May 2021, Maryland enacted the first law in the United States—and in the world—that comprehensively regulates law enforcement’s use of consumer genetic data to investigate crimes (1). Until now, the primary restraint on law enforcement has come from consumer genetics platforms themselves, with some declining to cooperate, some covertly cooperating, and a handful working openly with criminal investigators. Courts have largely taken a hands-off approach, and one of the only efforts at oversight emerged from the US Department of Justice (DOJ), which issued an “interim” policy in November 2019. By contrast, Maryland’s new law—adopted with near-unanimous, bipartisan support—engaged a broad array of stakeholders and was adopted by elected officials after a transparent and open legislative process. Its success provides a roadmap for regulating genetic genealogy in a way that balances privacy and public safety, and its terms include six critical features that others should model moving forward.
Solving Crimes, Provoking Alarm
The technology at issue in the Maryland law came to the public’s attention with the high-profile arrest of Joseph James DeAngelo Jr. as the Golden State...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...