Regulating forensic genetic genealogy
By Natalie Ram, Erin E. Murphy, and Sonia M. Suter,
Science
| 09. 24. 2021
In May 2021, Maryland enacted the first law in the United States—and in the world—that comprehensively regulates law enforcement’s use of consumer genetic data to investigate crimes (1). Until now, the primary restraint on law enforcement has come from consumer genetics platforms themselves, with some declining to cooperate, some covertly cooperating, and a handful working openly with criminal investigators. Courts have largely taken a hands-off approach, and one of the only efforts at oversight emerged from the US Department of Justice (DOJ), which issued an “interim” policy in November 2019. By contrast, Maryland’s new law—adopted with near-unanimous, bipartisan support—engaged a broad array of stakeholders and was adopted by elected officials after a transparent and open legislative process. Its success provides a roadmap for regulating genetic genealogy in a way that balances privacy and public safety, and its terms include six critical features that others should model moving forward.
Solving Crimes, Provoking Alarm
The technology at issue in the Maryland law came to the public’s attention with the high-profile arrest of Joseph James DeAngelo Jr. as the Golden State...
Related Articles
By Pallab Gosh and Gwyndaf Hughes, BBC News | 06.26.2025
Work has begun on a controversial project to create the building blocks of human life from scratch, in what is believed to be a world first.
The research has been taboo until now because of concerns it could lead to...
Since the “CRISPR babies” scandal in 2018, no additional genetically modified babies are known to have been born. Now several techno-enthusiastic billionaires are setting up privately funded companies to genetically edit human embryos, with the explicit intention of creating genetically modified children.
Heritable genome editing remains prohibited by policies in the overwhelming majority of countries that have any relevant policy, and by a binding European treaty. Support for keeping it legally off limits is widespread, including among scientists...
By Ron Leuty, San Francisco Business Times | 06.16.2025
23andMe's two-step sale to a nonprofit led by former CEO Anne Wojcicki is nothing more than a dance around California's genetic privacy law, state Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a filing late Monday, one day before a judge will...
By Ed Cara, Gizmodo | 06.22.2025
In late May, several scientific organizations, including the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT), banded together to call for a 10-year moratorium on using CRISPR and related technologies to pursue human heritable germline editing. The declaration also outlined...