Reading Our Genome is Tough, But Epigenetics is Giving Us Valuable Clues
By Marcus Woo,
Wired
| 02. 19. 2015
Untitled Document
When scientists sequenced the human genome a decade ago, they hoped to unlock the code of life, the sequence of molecules lined up in every cell that, summed together, made a person a person—and possibly reveal new ways to understand and treat diseases. But the results turned out to be opaque. Biologist Eric Lander, who helped lead the effort, famously summed up the results in seven words: “Genome: Bought the book; hard to read.”
So the research community went looking for CliffsNotes. A decade ago scientists started looking into the “epigenome,” chemical modifications to DNA that tell cells which genes to turn on or turn off. This week that project got a huge data dump—24 journal articles laying out what the genomicists know so far about 111 different cell types, the inner lives of brains, hearts, blood, and skin. “It is giving us a view of the living, breathing genome in motion, as opposed to a static picture of DNA,” says Manolis Kellis, a computational biologist at MIT who worked on two of the new papers.
Just about every...
Related Articles
By Jason Liebowitz, The New Yorker | 03.06.2026
When Talaya Reid was in high school, in a quiet suburb of Philadelphia, she developed fatigue so severe that she spent afternoons napping instead of going out with friends. She was lethargic at school and her grades suffered, but after...
By Scott Solomon, The MIT Press Reader | 02.12.2026
Chris Mason is a man in a hurry.
“Sometimes walking from the subway to the lab takes too long, so I’ll start running,” he told me over breakfast at a bistro near his home in Brooklyn on a crisp...
By Katrina Miller, The New York TImes | 02.05.2026
Joseph Yracheta: The Native Biodata Consortium is the first nonprofit data and sample repository within the geographic bounds and legal jurisdiction of an American Indian nation, on the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation in Eagle Butte, S.D.
NativeBio participated in a ...
By David Jensen, California Stem Cell Report | 02.10.2026
Touchy issues involving accusations that California’s $12 billion gene and stem cell research agency is pushing aside “good science” in favor of new priorities and preferences will be aired again in late March at a public meeting in Sacramento.
The...