A Radical ’70s-Era Group Is Relaunching to Help Scientists Get Political Under Trump
By Rebecca Onion,
Slate
| 08. 29. 2018
Advocates of science are in a bad place right now. Some days, in this Second Year of Trump, scientism—a blanket defense of science as a virtuous and almost holy exercise of objectivity and rationality—feels like the only natural response to the rising darkness. But, tempting as it might be, cheerleading for capital-S “Science” can’t be the answer. Science—as historians of science and practitioners of science and technology studies readily argue—is not an objective refuge; it’s shaped by politics just like any other human endeavor. How can we acknowledge that fact while still arguing for science’s authority and value?
From 1969 through 1989, the group Science for the People tried to do just that. Its members took “science has a politics” as a philosophical starting point and then used that understanding to push for radical change. Early on, the group protested weapons labs. Members worked with the Black Panther Party, helping with their free health clinics, and with the Young Lords Organization, assisting them in offering free lead-poisoning testing services. They sent equipment to Vietnamese scientists and helped Midwestern farmworkers...
Related Articles
By Jamie Marsella, Teen Vogue | 07.02.2025
In March, at a White House event celebrating Women’s History Month, President Trump dubbed himself the “fertilization president,” a moniker meant to emphasize his commitment to expanding access to in vitro fertilization, or IVF. “We’re gonna have tremendous...
By Joel Kotkin, UnHerd | 07.01.2025
Visionaries, dreamers, and autocrats have long dreamt of reshaping humanity to their preferred model. In the last century, eugenics was enthusiastically embraced among Anglo-Saxon elites, then by Communist Russia as a means of creating a hyper-selfless Homo Sovieticus...
By Maren Behrensen, Tech Policy Press | 07.02.2025
Why is it dangerous when corporate executives, entrepreneurs and investors with enormous wealth and power collectively control the development and deployment of our most pervasive technologies? Most answers to this question focus on the technologies themselves, or the ways in...
By Philip Bump, Washington Post | 07.07.2025
There are a lot of questions worth asking about the New York Times’s report on Thursday about New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani. The most obvious is how Mamdani’s racial self-identification in his 2009 application to Columbia University...