Put Your (Frozen) Eggs in the Bank: Welcome to the Bioeconomy
By Victoria Turk,
Motherboard
| 02. 23. 2015
[Quotes CGS Fellow Lisa Ikemoto]
Untitled Document
Emerging reproductive technologies are helping address medical issues that affect fertility and give us more choice when it comes to family planning. But they also risk presenting our bodies from a new perspective: as a commodity to be banked, bought, and sold.
These social and political implications are the subject of a commentary in the Journal of Law and the Biosciences, by UC Davis bioethicist Lisa Ikemoto. She writes that “supply of the cells and bodies necessary for assisted reproductive technology use depends on market thinking and structural inequality.” In other words, the market depends on a discrepancy between rich and poor: Those who can afford to buy, and those who are in enough financial need that they will sell their eggs and sperm.
“The whole practice of egg donation, sperm donation, surrogacy, and I think in addition to that egg freezing not only for one’s own self but as a way of expanding egg banking for others’ use: All that relies on wealth inequality,” Ikemoto told me in a phone interview.
Her piece focuses on egg...
Related Articles
By Anna Collinson and Jo Adnitt, BBC | 08.18.2026
At least 30 children, most of them British, are feared to have been conceived by IVF treatment in northern Cyprus using the wrong sperm or egg donors.
In each case, the parents suspect they did not get the donors they...
What We Inherit by Sam Trejo and Daphne O. Martschenko; and Original Sin by Kathryn Paige Harden have a great deal in common, with substantial differences in style and emphasis. Both books attempt, in different ways, to show the reader just where current research into human genomics stands, where that might be going, and why the authors are interested. In short, the influence of genomic research on our societies is already large and seems likely to change them in ways...
By Dan Falk, Nautilus | 08.20.2026
The pseudoscience of eugenics, founded on the mistaken notion that nature envisions some “right” combination of genes, and that selective breeding can improve the human race, is making a comeback. While the heyday of eugenics was a century ago, the...
By Anna Louie Sussman, The New York Times | 08.21.2026
Since in vitro fertilization was invented nearly 50 years ago, at least 10 million children who would not otherwise exist have been brought into the world. New constellations of families — older moms, same-sex parents, single dads — have flourished...
