Put Your (Frozen) Eggs in the Bank: Welcome to the Bioeconomy
By Victoria Turk,
Motherboard
| 02. 23. 2015
[Quotes CGS Fellow Lisa Ikemoto]
Untitled Document
Emerging reproductive technologies are helping address medical issues that affect fertility and give us more choice when it comes to family planning. But they also risk presenting our bodies from a new perspective: as a commodity to be banked, bought, and sold.
These social and political implications are the subject of a commentary in the Journal of Law and the Biosciences, by UC Davis bioethicist Lisa Ikemoto. She writes that “supply of the cells and bodies necessary for assisted reproductive technology use depends on market thinking and structural inequality.” In other words, the market depends on a discrepancy between rich and poor: Those who can afford to buy, and those who are in enough financial need that they will sell their eggs and sperm.
“The whole practice of egg donation, sperm donation, surrogacy, and I think in addition to that egg freezing not only for one’s own self but as a way of expanding egg banking for others’ use: All that relies on wealth inequality,” Ikemoto told me in a phone interview.
Her piece focuses on egg...
Related Articles
By Carly Mallenbaum and Alex Golden, Axios | 04.08.2026
Without a federal law, surrogacy in the U.S. is governed by a patchwork of state regulations that can determine everything from whether agreements are legally binding to who is recognized as a parent at birth.
Why it matters: More Americans...
By Miguel Muñoz, Cadena SER | 08.04.2026
"Para ellos, una familia numerosa no solo es una preferencia personal, sino que es una obligación. Creen que tener tantos hijos como sea posible es necesario para evitar un futuro apocalíptico", aseguraba Xavier Orri, periodista y cofundador de Página Internacional...
By Mary Hartnett, WFYI | 03.30.2026
"1907 Indiana Eugenics Law" via Wikimedia Commons | CC by-SA 4.0
Indiana was the first government in the world to pass a eugenic sterilization law. The state sterilized 2,500 people from 1907-to-1974. Indiana apologized for implementing the program...
By Sarah Elizabeth Richards, Scientific American | 04.02.2026
For the past two decades, fertility specialists have wrestled with a troubling question: Why do Black people have lower live birth rates after in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment than white people?
Researchers have proposed several explanations, such as the fact...