A Preview of the Dangerous Future of Abortion Bans — Texas Senate Bill 8
By Whitney Arey, Ph.D et al.,,
The New England Journal of Medicine
| 06. 22. 2022
Photo by Gayatri Malhotra on Unsplash
When the U.S. Supreme Court issues its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the abortion care landscape will most likely be changed for at least a generation. Even before a draft opinion was leaked, many experts anticipated that the Court would overturn Roe v. Wade, and nearly half the states are poised to ban or dramatically limit abortion care when that occurs.1 These state laws criminalizing abortion may allow for very narrow exemptions, and anyone who violates the law could be subject to civil penalties, criminal fines, or imprisonment.2
Health systems and clinicians planning their responses3 can look to Texas, where we have already witnessed the impact of strict abortion bans on the provision of evidence-based, essential health care for pregnant people. Since September 1, 2021, Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8) has prohibited abortions after the detection of embryonic cardiac activity, which occurs around 6 weeks after a person’s last menstrual period. After that point, SB8 allows abortions only in physician-documented medical emergencies. Anyone suspected of violating... see more
Related Articles
By CGS Staff
| 05.15.2023
On May 4, the Center for Genetics and Society contributed invited remarks about heritable gene editing at a comment session hosted by the National Council on Disability (NCD), the US federal agency that advises government and the private sector on disability policy. Some 17 speakers, including representatives of disability and patient advocacy organizations, scholars, medical researchers, and genetic counselors, weighed in for three minutes each on the topic “Germline editing, fetal medicine, and their impact on people with disabilities.”
The...
Adapted from Mitochondrial DNA at
National Human Genome Research Institute
The Guardian reports that “a small number of babies” with DNA from three people have now been born in the UK. The exact number has not been disclosed; it is less than five but more than one. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the government agency that regulates the process, revealed that much in response to a freedom of information request, and noted in a rather terse statement that...
By Phil Barber, The Press Democrat | 05.03.2023
By David Jensen, The California Stem Cell Report | 04.24.2023
What good is a “miraculous” cure or a revolutionary therapy -- which is the goal of a $12 billion state of California enterprise -- if it is not accessible to patients?
That’s a question implicitly posed by a former member...
