Presentation at the Symposium, "The Next Four Years, the Biotech Agenda, the Human Future: What Direction for Liberals and Progressives?"
By Sheldon Krimsky
| 12. 09. 2004
[summary]
I would like to focus on four points:
1) The discourse on science policy issues has been dominated by two extremist ideologies: libertarianism and conservative fundamentalism, with the former holding that there should be no constraints on science, and the later holding that the constraints on science are determined by religious evangelical principles. These two ideologies have generated the new false idols of the mind: the free market, and faith-based science.
2) These ideologies have staked out separate spheres of influence: the religious conservatives have purview over government policy, and the libertarians have the private sector. So you have two systems of ethics, one for the government and one for the private sector, with the universities straddling both.
3) Traditional sector boundaries are disappearing, notably that between academia and the private market. This has generated a crisis in the integrity of science. Drug manufacturers are running clinical trials of drugs. Manufacturers of cancer drugs are taking over management of cancer treatment centers.
4) The corporate capitalist and the neo-conservative fundamentalist agendas have found their rapproachement: the religious right wants...
Related Articles
By Anna Collinson and Jo Adnitt, BBC | 08.18.2026
At least 30 children, most of them British, are feared to have been conceived by IVF treatment in northern Cyprus using the wrong sperm or egg donors.
In each case, the parents suspect they did not get the donors they...
By Hamed Aleaziz, The New York Times | 08.13.2026
Immigrants at Ellis Island undergoing a medical inspection | Photo by The New York Public Library on Unsplash
In 1924, Congress sent a message to the world: We are no longer ready to take “your tired, your poor, your huddled...
What We Inherit by Sam Trejo and Daphne O. Martschenko; and Original Sin by Kathryn Paige Harden have a great deal in common, with substantial differences in style and emphasis. Both books attempt, in different ways, to show the reader just where current research into human genomics stands, where that might be going, and why the authors are interested. In short, the influence of genomic research on our societies is already large and seems likely to change them in ways...
By Dan Falk, Nautilus | 08.20.2026
The pseudoscience of eugenics, founded on the mistaken notion that nature envisions some “right” combination of genes, and that selective breeding can improve the human race, is making a comeback. While the heyday of eugenics was a century ago, the...
