Presentation at the Symposium, "The Next Four Years, the Biotech Agenda, the Human Future: What Direction for Liberals and Progressives?"
By Sheldon Krimsky
| 12. 09. 2004
[summary]
I would like to focus on four points:
1) The discourse on science policy issues has been dominated by two extremist ideologies: libertarianism and conservative fundamentalism, with the former holding that there should be no constraints on science, and the later holding that the constraints on science are determined by religious evangelical principles. These two ideologies have generated the new false idols of the mind: the free market, and faith-based science.
2) These ideologies have staked out separate spheres of influence: the religious conservatives have purview over government policy, and the libertarians have the private sector. So you have two systems of ethics, one for the government and one for the private sector, with the universities straddling both.
3) Traditional sector boundaries are disappearing, notably that between academia and the private market. This has generated a crisis in the integrity of science. Drug manufacturers are running clinical trials of drugs. Manufacturers of cancer drugs are taking over management of cancer treatment centers.
4) The corporate capitalist and the neo-conservative fundamentalist agendas have found their rapproachement: the religious right wants...
Related Articles
By Jeffrey Gettleman and Maya Tekeli, The New York Times | 09.24.2025
For some Greenlanders, sorry isn’t enough.
The prime minister of Denmark, Mette Frederiksen, made a special visit Wednesday to Greenland’s capital, Nuuk, to apologize in person for a traumatic chapter in Greenlandic history, when Danish doctors forced birth control on...
By Alondra Nelson, Science | 09.11.2025
In the United States, the summer of 2025 will be remembered as artificial intelligence’s (AI’s) cruel summer—a season when the unheeded risks and dangers of AI became undeniably clear. Recent months have made visible the stakes of the unchecked use...
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
GeneWatch UK has prepared a briefing on the genetic modification of nature for the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Congress in October 2025
The upcoming Congress claims to be “where the world comes together to set priorities and drive conservation and sustainable development action.” A major concern for those on the outside is that the Congress may advance plans to develop and encourage the use of synthetic biology in nature conservation. This could at first glance sound like...