In one niche, the risk to women is too great
By Judy Norsigian,
The Boston Globe
| 11. 14. 2010
[Op-Ed]
Not all stem cell research is in women's best interest.
The issue of embryonic stem cell research has long been clouded by certain activists — notably those from conservative Christian groups — who seek to stop all such research because it involves destruction of an embryo. In contrast, many pro-choice women’s health advocates like my own organization have long supported most embryonic stem cell research. But there is a small subset of this research we oppose — somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT, also called embryo cloning or research cloning) — because of substantial concerns about health risks for the women who provide the fresh eggs that this research demands.
As part of SCNT, the nucleus of an egg (from an egg donor) is removed, and the nucleus of an adult stem cell is inserted in its place. By contrast, conventional embryonic stem cell research utilizes otherwise discarded embryos from fertility clinics, and does not require freshly harvested eggs, where women undergo the risks of egg extraction solely for research purposes. This distinction is crucial.
Because thousands of women regularly undergo...
Related Articles
By Tory Shepherd, The Guardian | 07.17.2026
Over eight years, Ethan and his wife went through nine rounds of IVF in Melbourne.
They travelled to Spain for two more, without success.
“I thought maybe the universe had decided we’re not supposed to have kids,” says Ethan, who...
By Oscar Lopez, The Guardian | 07.19.2026
Diogo Amaro met his future husband, Loup, in Paris and from the first date, he made one thing clear: he wanted to have children.
“Right off the bat, I was like: ‘If I’m going to be in a relationship with...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
