NSF board member resigns, saying Trump’s policies have harmed the agency
By Jeffrey Mervis,
Science
| 05. 13. 2025
“Alondra Nelson” by Sage Ross on Wikimedia Commons
licensed under CC by SA 2.0
In an unprecedented move, a member of the governing body for the National Science Foundation (NSF) resigned today, saying the presidentially appointed advisory board has become a “ceremonial assemblage … without consequence” during the first months of President Donald Trump’s administration.
Sociologist Alondra Nelson was appointed to the National Science Board (NSB) in the final months of former President Joe Biden’s administration, where she had served as acting director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy before returning to the Institute for Advanced Study in 2023. Her departure, which she announced this morning in an essay in Time, is believed to be the first time in the agency’s 75-year history that a member of the 24-person board resigned over a policy disagreement with an administration.
“The board should have been far more communicative—with both congressional leaders and the American public—about the changes occurring at NSF,” Nelson tells Science. “Even if these actions were taken without the board’s input or consent, I...
Related Articles
By Alondra Nelson, Science | 09.11.2025
In the United States, the summer of 2025 will be remembered as artificial intelligence’s (AI’s) cruel summer—a season when the unheeded risks and dangers of AI became undeniably clear. Recent months have made visible the stakes of the unchecked use...
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
Sir Francis Galton, 1890s, by Eveleen Myers (née Tennant)
npg.org
Public Domain via Wikipedia
As has been discussed in recent issues of Biopolitical Times (1, 2), there are, increasingly, companies that claim to be selling parents better babies by selecting the “best” embryos. These services don’t come cheap – think $50,000, or even more, for embryo testing, plus perhaps as much again for IVF and concomitant services. To most of us, that is extremely expensive...
By Johana Bhuiyan, The Guardian | 09.23.2025
In March 2021, a 25-year-old US citizen was traveling through Chicago’s Midway airport when they were stopped by US border patrol agents. Though charged with no crime, the 25-year-old was subjected to a cheek swab to collect their DNA, which...