New Three-Parent Baby Law ‘is Flawed and Open to Challenge’, says Senior Lawyer
By Steve Connor,
The Independent [UK]
| 01. 14. 2015
Untitled Document
The Government’s attempt to legalise so-called “three parent” babies is open to challenge by judicial review because of serious flaws in the proposed legislation, a senior lawyer has warned.
Legislation to allow mitochondrial donation is either unnecessary or invalid under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, according to international law expert Lord Brennan QC.
The written opinion, which has been passed to parliamentary authorities, says there are “significant doubts” about the legality of proposed regulations being introduced by the Department of Health.
Lord Brennan states: “If the regulations are approved in their current form, they may be open to challenge by way of judicial review.”
The Government has introduced new regulations to allow mitochondrial donation – where genetic material of two women’s eggs is merged with a man’s sperm, to ensure women with mitochondrial defects do not pass on mutations to their children – because it was thought that the controversial IVF technique was specifically banned under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008.
The Act defines a “permitted” egg or embryo as one whose “nuclear or mitochondrial...
Related Articles
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Emily Galpern] | 03.29.2026
More Americans are turning to surrogacy to build their families, as the practice becomes more common and more publicly discussed.
Why it matters: As surrogacy becomes more visible and accessible, ethical, legal and cultural tensions become harder to ignore...
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Surrogacy360] | 03.29.2026
Without a federal law, surrogacy in the U.S. is governed by a patchwork of state regulations/
Why it matters: Confusing, varied local rules can determine everything from whether agreements are legally binding to who is recognized as a parent at...
Cathy Tie seems to be good at starting businesses but not so dedicated to maintaining them. CGS, like many others, first heard of her thanks to Caiwei Chen and Antonio Regalado in MIT Technology Review, May 2025, as the partner (perhaps bride) of the notorious Chinese scientist He Jiankui, described in the headline as “China’s Frankenstein.” He prefers “Chinese Darwin.” She ran his Twitter account for a while, contributing such gems as:
Get in luddite, we’re going gene editing...
By Jessica Riskin, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 03.24.2026
This is the second part of the 14th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. You can read the...
