Most Australian women using IVF pay for add-on treatments with ‘weak’ evidence behind them, research finds
By Joseph Dunstan,
ABC News
| 05. 03. 2021
Most women undergoing IVF treatment in Australia are paying for one or more add-on treatments, despite limited proof of their effectiveness, new research has found.
Key points:
- Researchers found 82 per cent of women paid for an add-on during IVF treatment
- Acupuncture, pre-implantation genetic testing and Chinese herbal medicine were the three most common treatments
- Lead author Sarah Lensen said the evidence base for many of the add-on treatments was weak
Researchers from Australia, the United Kingdom and the Victorian IVF regulator VARTA found 82 per cent of 1,590 women surveyed had used an additional treatment while undergoing IVF.
Lead author and University of Melbourne researcher Sarah Lensen said the most common add-on treatments identified in the survey were acupuncture, pre-implantation genetic testing of embryos for abnormal chromosomes and Chinese herbal medicine.
But Dr Lensen said the evidence base for the treatments was “rather weak.”
“None of the add-ons that they use in Australia are supported by high quality, robust evidence that they help people to have a baby from IVF and that they're safe to use,” she said.
“There is... see more
Related Articles
By Melody Petersen, Los Angeles Times | 05.26.2021
The decision of whether to have a child can be hard even under the best of circumstances. For those with a family history of debilitating disease, it’s often gut-wrenching. If only there were some way to answer the all-important question...
By Maria Cheng, Associated Press [cites CGS' Marcy Darnovsky] | 05.26.2021
New guidelines released Wednesday remove a decades-old barrier to stem cell research, recommending that researchers be allowed to grow human embryos longer under limited conditions.
The “14-day rule,” an international ethical standard that limits laboratory studies of human embryos, has...
Two prominent groups of scientists, and two major American universities, are trying to patent methods for editing human embryos, with reproductive use clearly intended. Really. Right now.
Heritable genome editing – that is, altering the genes and traits of future children and generations – is prohibited in 70 countries and wildly controversial everywhere. But these people and institutions are laying the groundwork to capitalize on a future they apparently hope to make happen. This summary of what we currently know...
By Anna Louie Sussman, The New Yorker | 05.19.2021
France Brunel, who is thirty-six, first considered freezing her eggs after ending a two-year relationship, in 2018. She’s not sure she wants children, especially if she remains single, and she knows egg-freezing does not guarantee her a baby. But she...
