Manipulating the Genome of Human Embryos: Some Unforeseen Effects
By Craig Holdrege,
The Nature Institute
| 06. 22. 2015
Untitled Document
In recent years scientists have developed powerful tools to create specific breaks in DNA sequences. They can then either repair those breaks or introduce new DNA into the sequence at the site of the break. These are called genome editing techniques. Two main techniques at present are the CRISPR-Cas9 system and zinc-finger nucleases. In principle, researchers can modify any part of the genome. They have achieved intended modifications in experiments with human and animal cells and also with mouse embryos. But the specific alterations do not always occur and there are also unintended effects.
The techniques are not as precise as they are sometimes made out to be, so there is every reason for caution in their application, especially in connection with the manipulation of human cells or human embryos. But over and beyond technical issues is the pressing ethical concern: should researchers cross the line into genetically manipulating human embryos?
Knowing that scientists in China were performing these experiments, two groups of researchers and others published comments in Science and Nature in March 2015 warning about...
Related Articles
By Tarandeep Hira, BioNews | 05.26.2026
Fifteen people, including five doctors, have been charged in Maharashtra, India, following an investigation into the exploitation of financially vulnerable egg donors.
A nearly 5000-page chargesheet was filed before a court in Ulhasnagar. The investigation began in February after a...
By Aarya Chand, The Kathmandu Post | 05.21.2026
KATHMANDU – When Padma was 22, she was diagnosed with cancer. What followed were three brutal cycles of chemotherapy—each necessary, each taking something from her. Doctors warned that the radiation would damage her ovaries. But Padma was fighting to stay...
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 05.24.2026
More than anything else in the world, Erin Millender longed to be a mother. She already had a day care picked out, a Pack ’n Play stashed in her basement. She’d tried Chinese pregnancy teas and midnight fertility ceremonies under...
By Nanette Elster, Kayhan Parsi, and Art Caplan, The American Journal of Bioethics | 05.06.2026
“Better babies.” “Fitter families.” “Survival of the fittest.” “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” These phrases are not merely historical reminders of the United States’ regrettable eugenic past but are appearing in an increasingly eugenic present. Eugenics may have seemed...