Letter to the editor regarding "At Birth, Tales of Joy and Heartbreak"
By Marcy Darnovsky,
New York Times
| 10. 14. 2009
To the Editor:
“The Gift of Life, and Its Price” reports that the fertility industry’s professional organization encourages its members to transfer fewer embryos, so as to produce fewer multiple pregnancies and premature babies. The organization, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, is to be commended for these efforts.
But its guidelines are routinely flouted. The society could put teeth behind its rules by publicly suspending the memberships of fertility practices in noncompliance. And it has resisted calls for public regulation and oversight.
Recent experiences with the financial sector have dramatized the dangers of inadequate public policy. The fertility industry, too, demonstrates the limits of self-regulation. Public regulation must be carefully written and not used to advance other agendas like opposition to reproductive rights. It’s past time for the federal government to set rules for the fertility industry and establish ways to enforce them.
Marcy Darnovsky
Berkeley, Calif., Oct. 11, 2009
The writer is associate executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society.
Related Articles
By Hamed Aleaziz, The New York Times | 08.13.2026
Immigrants at Ellis Island undergoing a medical inspection | Photo by The New York Public Library on Unsplash
In 1924, Congress sent a message to the world: We are no longer ready to take “your tired, your poor, your huddled...
What We Inherit by Sam Trejo and Daphne O. Martschenko; and Original Sin by Kathryn Paige Harden have a great deal in common, with substantial differences in style and emphasis. Both books attempt, in different ways, to show the reader just where current research into human genomics stands, where that might be going, and why the authors are interested. In short, the influence of genomic research on our societies is already large and seems likely to change them in ways...
By Dan Falk, Nautilus | 08.20.2026
The pseudoscience of eugenics, founded on the mistaken notion that nature envisions some “right” combination of genes, and that selective breeding can improve the human race, is making a comeback. While the heyday of eugenics was a century ago, the...
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross, MedPage Today | 08.18.2026
Few things evoke a greater sense of desperation than a parent seeking an experimental treatment for their child. That desperation can make even extraordinary risks seem worth taking. This dynamic has come into stark relief after Mei, a 6-year-old girl...