Keep Us Human:
If We're Truly Smart, We'll Refuse to Foolishly Tamper with Our DNA
By Bill McKibben,
Los Angeles Times
| 04. 14. 2003
The 50th anniversary of the double helix has been greeted with
worldwide hoopla. It began in February, the month that James
Watson and Francis Crick actually made their discovery, and
will culminate this month with the golden anniversary of the
paper they published announcing the news to the world.
The celebration is appropriate; understanding of the gene is
rivaled only by understanding of the atom as the great scientific
achievement of the last century. But just as cracking the atom
raised the deepest ethical and practical dilemmas, so too does
cracking the gene. Our new knowledge of genetic manipulation
forces us to ask a question other generations couldn't have
imagined: Are we a good enough species?
Consider Watson, who has been the towering figure in genetics
research since that first paper -- the "commanding general"
of the DNA revolution, in the words of London's Guardian. He
has used his fame and influence to push for changing human beings
in the most radical ways. Human embryos should be manipulated,
he has said, to increase intelligence, to eliminate shyness,
even to make...
Related Articles
By Jared Whitlock, Endpoints News | 10.09.2025
When Nirnay Murthy learned about a treatment for his toddler son’s rare condition, relief quickly gave way to disappointment.
A one-time gene therapy called Zolgensma from the Swiss drugmaker Novartis can halt spinal muscular atrophy, a deadly condition that causes...
By Meagan Parrish, PharmaVoice | 10.10.2025
When CEO Ben Lamm steps into the spotlight, it’s usually to talk about his efforts bringing extinct animals back to life. Once a far-flung idea, Lamm and the company he heads, Colossal Biosciences, have proven they can pull it off...
By Rob Stein, NPR | 09.30.2025
Scientists have created human eggs containing genes from adult skin cells, a step that someday could help women who are infertile or gay couples have babies with their own genes but would also raise difficult ethical, social and legal issues...
By Daniel Hildebrand, The Humanist | 10.01.2025
When most people hear the word eugenics, they think of dusty history textbooks and black-and-white photographs: forced sterilizations in the early 20th century, pseudoscientific charts measuring skulls, the language of “fitness” used to justify violence and exclusion. It feels like...
