IVF Testing Spurs a Debate Over ‘Mosaic’ Embryos
By Sumathi Reddy,
The Wall Street Jounral
| 03. 21. 2018
It was her last chance.
MaryJo Dunn had been trying to get pregnant through in-vitro fertilization for 20 months.
At age 45, she expected it to be challenging. But giving up wasn’t easy. She and her husband had lost their only child, a 17-month-old son, two years earlier to a rare type of cancer.
The Dunns were running out of time and money. They had already spent more than $70,000 on fertility treatments and taken out a loan. But the doctor recommended against implanting Ms. Dunn’s two remaining embryos, she recalls, because of the results of genetic tests on them. However, a counselor at the testing lab explained that the embryos weren’t technically abnormal. One was undetermined because the DNA in the sample was of poor quality. The other was a type known as “mosaic,” an embryo with both normal and abnormal cells.
“At that point I didn’t know that there was even a possibility of transferring mosaic embryos or that they could result in a healthy baby,” Ms. Dunn says. After discussion with her doctor, she decided to go...
Related Articles
By Tarandeep Hira, BioNews | 05.26.2026
Fifteen people, including five doctors, have been charged in Maharashtra, India, following an investigation into the exploitation of financially vulnerable egg donors.
A nearly 5000-page chargesheet was filed before a court in Ulhasnagar. The investigation began in February after a...
By Aarya Chand, The Kathmandu Post | 05.21.2026
KATHMANDU – When Padma was 22, she was diagnosed with cancer. What followed were three brutal cycles of chemotherapy—each necessary, each taking something from her. Doctors warned that the radiation would damage her ovaries. But Padma was fighting to stay...
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 05.24.2026
More than anything else in the world, Erin Millender longed to be a mother. She already had a day care picked out, a Pack ’n Play stashed in her basement. She’d tried Chinese pregnancy teas and midnight fertility ceremonies under...
By Nanette Elster, Kayhan Parsi, and Art Caplan, The American Journal of Bioethics | 05.06.2026
“Better babies.” “Fitter families.” “Survival of the fittest.” “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” These phrases are not merely historical reminders of the United States’ regrettable eugenic past but are appearing in an increasingly eugenic present. Eugenics may have seemed...
