Inequality, Democracy and the New Human Biotechnologies
By Richard Hayes
| 07. 15. 2004
Presentation at Inequality, Democracy and the New Human Biotechnologies: A Threshold Challenge for the 21st Century, New York, NY [PDF Version]
The new technologies of human genetic modification are among
the two or three most profoundly consequential technologies
of the 21st century. They have the potential for both great
good and great harm. They are being developed at an extraordinary
pace. There is little public oversight and control of their
development and use.
If these technologies are developed and used in the prevailing
context of free-market competition and individualist social
values, they could greatly exacerbate existing inequalities
in health and social power, and existing modes of discrimination
and exploitation. In addition, certain applications of these
technologies could open the door to a new high-tech eugenics
that would undermine the foundations of democratic civil society.
The dynamics of inequality, democracy and the new human biotechnologies
works the other way as well: at this moment, inequalities of
power and influence are themselves subverting democratic decision-making
concerning the development and use of the new human biotechnologies.
Surveys show that Americans are...
Related Articles
By Annika Inampudi, Science | 08.01.2025
In June, Sara* received a message asking whether she wanted to continue to participate in a massive, multicenter research project led by scientists at Aarhus University in Denmark. The iPsych study, the message said, had sequenced her genetic data from...
The Center for Genetics and Society is delighted to recommend the current edition of GMWatch Review – Number 589. UK-based GMWatch, a long-standing ally, was founded in 1998 by Jonathan Matthews as an independent organization seeking to counter the enormous corporate political power and propaganda of the GMO industry and its supporters. Matthews and Claire Robinson are its directors and managing editors.
CGS works to ensure that social justice, equity, human rights, and democratic governance are front...
By Harry Hunter, PET BioNews | 08.11.2025
The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology has announced plans to publish a POSTnote and called for submissions on surrogacy law in the UK and internationally.
The current UK surrogacy laws, largely based on legislation from the 1980s, have been...
By Molly Gray, Nuffield Council on Bioethics | 08.13.2025
Human embryo at about 8 weeks
by Anatomist90, CC3.0
With debate growing around whether the “14-day rule” on human embryo research remains fit for purpose, the need for inclusive public dialogue is more important than ever. Decisions about whether...
