High-interest clones
By Editorial,
Nature
| 10. 06. 2011
When, in 2004, Woo Suk Hwang claimed to have produced a stem-cell line derived from an embryonic human clone, his research, done at Seoul University, sparked intense interest and hype. Even though Hwang's work later proved to be fraudulent, all advances in the field risk being measured against it. At the same time, researchers seek to distance themselves from the episode to the extent that its ethical implications for current work are rarely discussed.
This week, scientists have come the closest of any so far in emulating Hwang's claimed results: on page 70, researchers from the New York Stem Cell Foundation Laboratory report using cloning technology to reprogram human DNA taken from an adult and create embryonic stem cells. But they do not use the term cloning to describe their results. That is one of many contrasts between the research landscape now and in 2004.
Hwang's claims received worldwide attention. Patient groups jumped for joy; scientists around the world used the results to gather more funds for stem-cell research; and bioethicists emerged to justify or condemn the work. Reaction...
Related Articles
By Antonio Regalado, MIT Technology Review | 03.30.2026
After operating in secrecy for years, a startup company called R3 Bio, in Richmond, California, suddenly shared details about its work last week—saying it had raised money to create nonsentient monkey “organ sacks” as an alternative to animal testing.
In...
By Deni Ellis Béchard, The Washington Post | 10.07.2025
In 1949, when John Gurdon was a 16-year-old boarding school student at Eton College in England, his teacher described his biology studies as “disastrous” and his scientific ambitions as “ridiculous.”
“If he can’t learn simple biological facts,” his term report...
By John H. Evans, Craig Callender, Neal K. Devaraj, Farren J. Isaacs, and Gregory E. Kaebnick, Issues in Science and Technology | 07.04.2025
The controversy around a ban on “mirror life” should lead to a more nuanced public conversation about how to manage the benefits and risks of precursor biotechnologies.
About five years ago, the five of us formed a discussion group to...
Riquet Mammoth Kakao (c.1920)
by Ludwig Hohlwein, Public Domain via Flickr
Colossal, the de-extinction company, scored headlines (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) recently by announcing that they had created mice! Not just any mice, not even colossal mice, but genetically engineered, normal-size “woolly mice” that are the result of editing seven genes in mouse embryos. This Colossal presented as an important step toward making a specimen of charismatic megafauna – a...