A genetic “Minority Report”: How corporate DNA testing could put us at risk
By Benjamin Winterhalter,
Salon
| 01. 26. 2014
On Nov. 22, 2013, the FDA sent a now-infamous letter to the genetic
research startup 23andMe, ordering the company to stop marketing some of
its personal DNA testing kits. In its letter, the agency told 23andMe
that it was concerned about the possibility of erroneous test results,
about false positives and false negatives. The FDA warned that false
positives – for example, being told that one has a high risk of breast
cancer when really one doesn’t – might lead customers to seek expensive
testing or medical treatment that they don’t really need. False
negatives – which are just the opposite – might lead customers to ignore
serious health problems or deviate from a prescribed treatment regime.
The company had been out of contact with the FDA since May of 2013, and
had not filed the required information to allay the bureau’s concerns.
When
word about the letter got out, the ever-ready machine of Internet
journalism whirred quickly to life. Defenders of the genetic research
firm argued that the information, if used properly and with a
physician’s supervision, is not only...
Related Articles
By Peter Ward, Slate | 03.30.2026
I’m in a cramped examination room at a clinic in Panama City. The lights are dim, and calming classical music plays from built-in speakers. A nurse has injected a dose of stem cells into Kenneth Scott through an IV in...
By Fyodor D. Urnov and Sadik H. Kassim, Nature | 04.21.2026
In February, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed a radical rethink of how scientists, physicians and manufacturers develop personalized genetic therapies. The regulator’s suggested introduction of a ‘plausible mechanism pathway’ should increase incentives for drug companies to develop...
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Emily Galpern] | 03.29.2026
More Americans are turning to surrogacy to build their families, as the practice becomes more common and more publicly discussed.
Why it matters: As surrogacy becomes more visible and accessible, ethical, legal and cultural tensions become harder to ignore...
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Surrogacy360] | 03.29.2026
Without a federal law, surrogacy in the U.S. is governed by a patchwork of state regulations/
Why it matters: Confusing, varied local rules can determine everything from whether agreements are legally binding to who is recognized as a parent at...