Gene therapies for rare diseases are under threat. Scientists hope to save them
By Heidi Ledford,
Nature
| 10. 06. 2023
It was one of gene therapy’s greatest successes — and greatest disappointments.
Strimvelis is a potent treatment for a devastating genetic disorder of the immune system and one of the first gene therapies to be approved in Europe. But in 2022, the company that sold it announced that it could no longer afford to do so: Strimvelis was highly effective at treating disease, but not at turning a profit.
Now it is getting a second chance. The Italian charity Telethon Foundation in Milan has announced that it will produce Strimvelis itself. “We are making a paradigm shift,” said Francesca Pasinelli, general manager of the Telethon Foundation, in a 12 September statement announcing the decision. “We are the first non-profit organization to take on the commercialization of a gene therapy.”
The charity’s unprecedented scheme offers hope to scientists who have spent decades developing gene therapies for rare disorders, only to find that the standard way of getting those treatments to people in need — licensing them to for-profit companies — is unavailable. Other unorthodox ways to keep these efforts going...
Related Articles
By Jenny Lange, BioNews | 12.01.2025
A UK toddler with a rare genetic condition was the first person to receive a new gene therapy that appears to halt disease progression.
Oliver, now three years old, has Hunter syndrome, an inherited genetic disorder that leads to physical...
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
By Pam Belluck and Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 11.19.2025
Gene-editing therapies offer great hope for treating rare diseases, but they face big hurdles: the tremendous time and resources involved in devising a treatment that might only apply to a small number of patients.
A study published on Wednesday...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...