Four Problems with the DNA Database
By Sharon Fernandes,
Times of India
| 08. 02. 2015
Untitled Document
India's Human DNA Profiling Bill 2015 proposes to set up a national DNA database of criminals that will include rapists, murderers and kidnappers. But the proposed draft is being criticized on several grounds — from being insensitive to privacy issues to allowing intrusive modes of sample collection.
The draft has been drawn up by the Department of Biotechnology in association with an autonomous institution, the Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD) and has been in the works for 12 years. But international activist groups monitoring developments in genetic technologies like GeneWatch UK, Council for Responsible Genetics, USA and online collectives like The Forensic Genetics Policy Initiative (FGPI) say it doesn't have enough safeguards built into it.
Too large and sweeping
The DNA databank, as visualized in the draft bill, will have six categories, ranging from suspects to missing persons (see box). The offenders' index in the final bill may even encompass minor crimes such as the MV (Motor Vehicles) Act offences.
"Making the database too big and poorly regulated will not help solve more crimes," says Helen...
Related Articles
By Margaux MacColl, The San Francisco Standard | 09.17.2025
Designer babies are coming soon to an IVF clinic near you.
Nucleus Genomics, founded by Kian Sadeghi in 2020, when he was just 20, got its start analyzing genomes to weigh a person’s risk of everything from cancer to ADHD...
By Johana Bhuiyan, The Guardian | 09.23.2025
In March 2021, a 25-year-old US citizen was traveling through Chicago’s Midway airport when they were stopped by US border patrol agents. Though charged with no crime, the 25-year-old was subjected to a cheek swab to collect their DNA, which...
By Annika Inampudi, Science | 08.01.2025
In June, Sara* received a message asking whether she wanted to continue to participate in a massive, multicenter research project led by scientists at Aarhus University in Denmark. The iPsych study, the message said, had sequenced her genetic data from...
The Center for Genetics and Society is delighted to recommend the current edition of GMWatch Review – Number 589. UK-based GMWatch, a long-standing ally, was founded in 1998 by Jonathan Matthews as an independent organization seeking to counter the enormous corporate political power and propaganda of the GMO industry and its supporters. Matthews and Claire Robinson are its directors and managing editors.
CGS works to ensure that social justice, equity, human rights, and democratic governance are front...