FDA Approved Breast Cancer DNA Test by 23andMe May do More Harm than Good
By Joyce Bichler,
Breast Cancer Action
| 03. 07. 2018
Yesterday, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first time approved an at-home genetic testing kit without a doctor’s prescription to predict the risk of breast cancer. While there’s no doubt the move will be celebrated by some, the truth is that there is cause for serious concern. This decision by the FDA threatens to do more harm than good for women at risk of and living with breast cancer.
Most immediately, the 23andMe test approved for over-the-counter use looks at just three of the more than 1000 known BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. While these three specific mutations are the most common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for people of Ashkenazi ancestry, they are not the most common BRCA mutations in the broader population, raising serious health equity concerns. This means that if you’re someone who receives a negative result from the 23andMe test, there is still the possibility that you may carry other harmful BRCA mutations that increase the risk of breast cancer.
At Breast Cancer Action, we’ve long argued that genetic testing should always be accompanied by independent...
Related Articles
By Megan Molteni and Anil Oza, STAT | 10.07.2025
For two years, a panel of scientific experts, clinicians, and patient advocates had been hammering out ways to increase community engagement in National Institutes of Health-funded science. When they presented their road map to the NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya last...
Paula Amato & Shoukhrat Mitalipov
[OHSU News/Christine Torres Hicks]
On September 30th, a team of 21 scientists from Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) published a significant paper in Nature Communications, with a scientifically accurate but, to many, somewhat abstruse headline:
Induction of experimental cell division to generate cells with reduced chromosome ploidy
The lead authors were Shoukhrat Mitalipov, recently described here as “a push-the-envelope biologist,” and his long-term colleague Paula Amato. (Recall that in July the pair had co-published with...
By Pam Belluck, The New York Times | 10.17.2025
Before dawn on a March morning, Doug Whitney walked into a medical center 2,000 miles from home, about to transform from a mild-mannered, bespectacled retiree into a superhuman research subject.
First, a doctor inserted a needle into his back to...
By Julia Black, MIT Technology Review | 10.16.2025
Consider, if you will, the translucent blob in the eye of a microscope: a human blastocyst, the biological specimen that emerges just five days or so after a fateful encounter between egg and sperm. This bundle of cells, about the size of...