FDA Approved Breast Cancer DNA Test by 23andMe May do More Harm than Good
By Joyce Bichler,
Breast Cancer Action
| 03. 07. 2018
Yesterday, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first time approved an at-home genetic testing kit without a doctor’s prescription to predict the risk of breast cancer. While there’s no doubt the move will be celebrated by some, the truth is that there is cause for serious concern. This decision by the FDA threatens to do more harm than good for women at risk of and living with breast cancer.
Most immediately, the 23andMe test approved for over-the-counter use looks at just three of the more than 1000 known BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. While these three specific mutations are the most common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for people of Ashkenazi ancestry, they are not the most common BRCA mutations in the broader population, raising serious health equity concerns. This means that if you’re someone who receives a negative result from the 23andMe test, there is still the possibility that you may carry other harmful BRCA mutations that increase the risk of breast cancer.
At Breast Cancer Action, we’ve long argued that genetic testing should always be accompanied by independent...
Related Articles
By Nicholas Wade, The New York Times | 04.30.2026
“J. Craig Venter” via Wikimedia Commons licensed under CC by 2.5
J. Craig Venter, a scientist and entrepreneur who raced to decode the human genome, died on Wednesday in San Diego. He was 79.
His death was announced by...
By Jonathan Basile, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 04.29.2026
WILLIAM BATESON, a foundational figure in the science of genetics at the turn of the last century, once recounted the response of a Scottish soldier to one of his public lectures: “Sir, what ye’re telling us is nothing but Scientific...
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick , Heredity | 04.20.2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it...
By Staff, GMWatch | 03.28.2026
Following a recent podcast interview we were asked whether there is any solid scientific research looking at how gene expression or molecular composition in genetically modified (GM) plants differs from conventionally bred plants. As this is an interesting and important...