FDA Approved Breast Cancer DNA Test by 23andMe May do More Harm than Good
By Joyce Bichler,
Breast Cancer Action
| 03. 07. 2018
Yesterday, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first time approved an at-home genetic testing kit without a doctor’s prescription to predict the risk of breast cancer. While there’s no doubt the move will be celebrated by some, the truth is that there is cause for serious concern. This decision by the FDA threatens to do more harm than good for women at risk of and living with breast cancer.
Most immediately, the 23andMe test approved for over-the-counter use looks at just three of the more than 1000 known BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. While these three specific mutations are the most common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for people of Ashkenazi ancestry, they are not the most common BRCA mutations in the broader population, raising serious health equity concerns. This means that if you’re someone who receives a negative result from the 23andMe test, there is still the possibility that you may carry other harmful BRCA mutations that increase the risk of breast cancer.
At Breast Cancer Action, we’ve long argued that genetic testing should always be accompanied by independent...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Frankie Fattorini, Pharmaceutical Technology | 12.02.2025
Próspera, a charter city on Roatán island in Honduras, hosts two biotechs working to combat ageing through gene therapy, as the organisation behind the city advertises its “flexible” regulatory jurisdiction to attract more developers.
In 2021, Minicircle set up a...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...