Experts condemn asylum DNA tests
By BBC,
BBC News
| 09. 30. 2009
The UK Border Agency "human provenance pilot project" is aimed at stopping people "swapping" nationality in the hope of remaining in the UK.
It is testing migrants to try to establish where they are from.
But scientists say it is not possible to tell what country a person comes from using the tests.
The pilot began earlier this month, targeting migrants from the Horn of Africa. Mouth swabs, hair and nail samples will be tested on a voluntary basis.
It is understood there is concern that some asylum seekers are pretending to be from countries like war-torn Somalia when making their asylum claims when in fact they are from neighbouring countries.
The Home Office said "nationality swapping is often used by fraudulent asylum seekers to help prevent their removal.
"That is why we are continuously looking at new and improved ways to ensure that we can ascertain the correct identity and nationality from every asylum seeker."
Professor Sir Alec Jeffreys of the University of Leicester pioneered human DNA fingerprinting. He described the pilot as "naive and scientifically flawed".
"It is...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...