An ELSI for AI: Learning from genetics to govern algorithms
By Alondra Nelson,
Science
| 09. 11. 2025
In the United States, the summer of 2025 will be remembered as artificial intelligence’s (AI’s) cruel summer—a season when the unheeded risks and dangers of AI became undeniably clear. Recent months have made visible the stakes of the unchecked use of AI: The parents of 16-year-old Adam Raine filed the first known wrongful death lawsuit against OpenAI, claiming ChatGPT contributed to their son's suicide by advising him on methods and offering to write his suicide note. A psychiatrist's investigation revealed that AI therapy chatbots encouraged troubled teens to “get rid of” parents and made sexual suggestions while falsely claiming to be licensed therapists. Reports emerged of a man hospitalized after following ChatGPT’s advice to add sodium bromide to his diet. Trevis Williams reportedly spent more than 2 days wrongfully jailed after facial recognition technology misidentified him despite obvious physical differences and geolocation data proving he was miles away from the crime scene.
Although comprehensive data on the frequency of AI failures—whether in absolute terms or relative to successful applications—is lacking, existing evidence makes clear that such incidents are not merely...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
By Grace Won, KQED Forum [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...