DNA testing vital to obtaining just convictions
By Jim Petro,
Cincinnati- USA Today Network
| 06. 19. 2017
As a state legislator, I served on the House committee that drafted Ohio’s current death penalty law. Later, as Ohio Attorney General, I monitored 18 executions. I believed that the criminal justice system does not make mistakes, especially in murder cases. However, with nearly 800 wrongful murder convictions identified in the U.S. since 1989, I now know that we must do much more to protect innocent people from wrongful conviction – and even wrongful execution.
I was introduced to a wrongful murder conviction by the case of Clarence Elkins, a family man wrongfully convicted of raping and murdering his mother-in-law and raping his six-year-old niece in Barberton in 1998. He was convicted largely because his niece identified the perpetrator as looking like her Uncle Clarence. She recanted her identification, but it was not enough to overturn Elkins’s conviction. He then fought for DNA testing using more advanced technology, which excluded him as a match to critical evidence.
The State should have pursued the truth, but instead, it argued the DNA was contaminated and unreliable. Because Elkins got access to the...
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
By Jacob Bogage, The Washington Post | 09.03.2025
The conservative group behind the Project 2025 governing playbook for President Donald Trump’s second term is set to propose sweeping revisions to U.S. economic policy meant to encourage married heterosexual couples to have more children.
The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing...
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 08.21.2025
Less than two weeks after an Alabama Supreme Court decision upended in vitro fertilization in the state and prompted a national backlash, over 100 conservative congressional staff members and I.V.F. skeptics crammed into a meeting room a few blocks from...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 08.23.2025
For Erica L and her husband, in-vitro fertilization was the “nuclear option”.
After two years of trying to conceive, Erica and her husband had no idea why they could not have a baby. Doctors said only that they had “unexplained...