DNA Samples Stir Doubts but Police Detectives Find Them Invaluable
By Natasha Robinson,
The Australian
| 09. 29. 2014
Untitled Document
IN inner-city Sydney, a man in his 50s answers an unexpected knock at the front door. It’s the police, carrying a DNA sample kit and some paperwork. A document explains to the man that he has been classified as an untested former offender, empowering the police to collect his DNA.
The document means little to the disability support pensioner, who is illiterate. But he does notice that his name is spelled incorrectly and his date of birth is wrong.
“He explained that he couldn’t read the letter,” says the man’s lawyer, Redfern Legal Service police powers solicitor David Porter. “But we can surmise on the basis of what the police used in their letter that he had never served a sentence for a violent offence.
“It had been a number of years since he had come into contact with police. His last period of imprisonment was 15 years ago.”
This year in NSW alone, hundreds of people have had similar knocks on the door from police officers seeking a sample of their DNA via a mouth swab. It...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
