Critics Say Cal's Genetic Tests Ignore 'Asian Flush' Risks
By Jeremy Hsu,
LiveScience
| 08. 05. 2010
Berkeley's incoming freshmen face the unprecedented choice of whether to take part in a genetic testing program this fall. But the students who volunteer for the controversial new test may get more than they bargained for if it turns up a gene deficiency responsible for what is known as "the Asian flush."
The gene has complex health implications that go beyond the surface symptom of a red face after downing an alcoholic drink or two. Even social drinkers are at higher risk of developing deadly esophageal cancer if they have a deficient version of the aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) gene, according to years of research.
That knowledge seems missing so far from the University of California-Berkeley's education initiative about genetic testing and the future of personalized medicine, called "Bring Your Genes to Cal." The program gives the new class of freshmen students the choice of submitting cheek swab samples to test confidentially for variants of three specific genes. One of them is ALDH2.
"Yeah, we purposefully chose three genes that are not disease-associated," said Mark Schlissel, a Berkeley dean of...
Related Articles
By Nicholas Wade, The New York Times | 04.30.2026
“J. Craig Venter” via Wikimedia Commons licensed under CC by 2.5
J. Craig Venter, a scientist and entrepreneur who raced to decode the human genome, died on Wednesday in San Diego. He was 79.
His death was announced by...
By Jonathan Basile, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 04.29.2026
WILLIAM BATESON, a foundational figure in the science of genetics at the turn of the last century, once recounted the response of a Scottish soldier to one of his public lectures: “Sir, what ye’re telling us is nothing but Scientific...
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick , Heredity | 04.20.2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it...
By Staff, GMWatch | 03.28.2026
Following a recent podcast interview we were asked whether there is any solid scientific research looking at how gene expression or molecular composition in genetically modified (GM) plants differs from conventionally bred plants. As this is an interesting and important...