CRISPR therapies march into clinic, but genotoxicity concerns linger
By Cormac Sheridan,
Nature
| 07. 15. 2021
A recent study has identified another potential hazard for developers of genome editing therapies based on CRISPR–Cas9. The double-strand DNA breaks introduced during CRISPR editing could result in chromothripsis, an extremely damaging form of genomic rearrangement that results from the shattering of individual chromosomes and the subsequent rejoining of the pieces in a haphazard order. Although most cells do not remain viable after undergoing such a dramatic alteration, those that do could, in theory, express oncogenic fusion proteins or give rise to dysregulated expression of particular genes that could cause problems.
So far, none of the companies leading the clinical development of CRISPR-based therapies appears to have considered the issue; its clinical implications, if any, remain unclear. However, the study, led by Mitchell Weiss of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and David Pellman of the Dana–Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, adds another layer of complexity to gene-editing’s already relatively complicated mechanism of action. “Most importantly, it’s an on-target effect. You cannot make this go away by making the cutting more specific,” says Pellman.
The study is the...
Related Articles
The Center for Genetics and Society is delighted to recommend the current edition of GMWatch Review – Number 589. UK-based GMWatch, a long-standing ally, was founded in 1998 by Jonathan Matthews as an independent organization seeking to counter the enormous corporate political power and propaganda of the GMO industry and its supporters. Matthews and Claire Robinson are its directors and managing editors.
CGS works to ensure that social justice, equity, human rights, and democratic governance are front...
By Ryan Cross, Endpoints News | 08.19.2025
Human eggs are incredibly rare cells. The ovary typically produces only 400 mature eggs across a woman’s life. But biologists in George Church’s lab at Harvard University — a group that’s never content with nature’s limits — just got a...
By Katherine Drabiak, Journal of Medical Ethics Forum | 08.07.2025
Adapted from Mitochondrial DNA at
National Human Genome Research Institute
Recently, media outlets around the world have been reporting on children born from pronuclear genome transfer (sometimes called “3-parent IVF,” “mitochondrial donation” or “mitochondrial replacement therapy”) at Newcastle Fertility Center...
By Nicky Hudson, The Conversation | 08.12.2025