Couple devoted to baby made to save firstborn
By Sydney Morning Herald,
Sydney Morning Herald
| 09. 26. 2004
An Australian couple who created medical history and sparked a storm of controversy over their decision to have a "designer" baby to save the life of their seriously ill son have spoken out about their choice.
The Tasmanian couple, known only as Stephen and Leanne, welcomed their life-saving baby boy, C.J., last month.
C.J. was conceived using the contentious technique called PGD (Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis) in which embryos are screened for genetic disorders before being implanted in the mother's uterus.
While debate rages over the ethics of so-called "spare parts" babies, for Stephen and Leanne it provided the only lifeline for their four-year-old son B.J. who suffers from a rare immune deficiency known as hyper IgM syndrome.
B.J.'s condition, which affects about 30 children in Australia, meant he had almost no immune system, leaving him open to serious infections.
His only chance at leading a normal life was a bone marrow transplant but no one in his family could provide a direct tissue match. So Stephen and Leanne made the difficult decision to conceive a child that would be free...
Related Articles
By Fyodor D. Urnov and Sadik H. Kassim, Nature | 04.21.2026
In February, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed a radical rethink of how scientists, physicians and manufacturers develop personalized genetic therapies. The regulator’s suggested introduction of a ‘plausible mechanism pathway’ should increase incentives for drug companies to develop...
By Miguel Muñoz, Cadena SER | 08.04.2026
"Para ellos, una familia numerosa no solo es una preferencia personal, sino que es una obligación. Creen que tener tantos hijos como sea posible es necesario para evitar un futuro apocalíptico", aseguraba Xavier Orri, periodista y cofundador de Página Internacional...
By Mary Hartnett, WFYI | 03.30.2026
"1907 Indiana Eugenics Law" via Wikimedia Commons | CC by-SA 4.0
Indiana was the first government in the world to pass a eugenic sterilization law. The state sterilized 2,500 people from 1907-to-1974. Indiana apologized for implementing the program...
By Sarah Elizabeth Richards, Scientific American | 04.02.2026
For the past two decades, fertility specialists have wrestled with a troubling question: Why do Black people have lower live birth rates after in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment than white people?
Researchers have proposed several explanations, such as the fact...