Couple devoted to baby made to save firstborn
By Sydney Morning Herald,
Sydney Morning Herald
| 09. 26. 2004
An Australian couple who created medical history and sparked a storm of controversy over their decision to have a "designer" baby to save the life of their seriously ill son have spoken out about their choice.
The Tasmanian couple, known only as Stephen and Leanne, welcomed their life-saving baby boy, C.J., last month.
C.J. was conceived using the contentious technique called PGD (Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis) in which embryos are screened for genetic disorders before being implanted in the mother's uterus.
While debate rages over the ethics of so-called "spare parts" babies, for Stephen and Leanne it provided the only lifeline for their four-year-old son B.J. who suffers from a rare immune deficiency known as hyper IgM syndrome.
B.J.'s condition, which affects about 30 children in Australia, meant he had almost no immune system, leaving him open to serious infections.
His only chance at leading a normal life was a bone marrow transplant but no one in his family could provide a direct tissue match. So Stephen and Leanne made the difficult decision to conceive a child that would be free...
Related Articles
By Evelina Johansson Wilén, Jacobin | 01.18.2026
In her book The Argonauts, Maggie Nelson describes pregnancy as an experience marked by a peculiar duality. On the one hand, it is deeply transformative, bodily alien, sometimes almost incomprehensible to the person undergoing it. On the other hand...
By Daphne O. Martschenko and Julia E. H. Brown, Hastings Bioethics Forum | 01.14.2026
There is growing concern that falling fertility rates will lead to economic and demographic catastrophe. The social and political movement known as pronatalism looks to combat depopulation by encouraging people to have as many children as possible. But not just...
By Paula Siverino Bavio, BioNews | 01.12.2026
For more than ten years, gestational surrogacy in Uruguay existed in a state of legal latency: provided for by law, carefully regulated as an exception, yet without a single birth to make it real.
That situation changed with the arrival...
By Andrew Gregory, The Guardian | 01.11.2026
Google has removed some of its artificial intelligence health summaries after a Guardian investigation found people were being put at risk of harm by false and misleading information.
The company has said its AI Overviews, which use generative AI to...