Clinical Pharmacologists Warn of DTC Genomics Backlash on PGx
By GenomeWeb,
GenomeWeb News
| 07. 22. 2009
The American College of Clinical Pharmacy has called for federal oversight of direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies, which it believes could inadvertently hold back advances in clinical pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic testing.
In a position statement published in the Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, ACCP argued that consumer response to genetic testing advertising could have "both immediate and long-term effects on public health and the future adoption of pharmacogenetic/genomic testing."
The paper explains that consumers could be let down or confused by the performance of DTC genetic tests, which could have a negative impact on other genetic testing firms that do not market directly to consumers.
The ACCP likened consumer ads for genetic tests to those for prescription drugs, which are regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration's Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications. The group noted that a similar oversight system is not yet in place for the young genetic testing field.
"Given the rate of development of genetic testing and its widespread availability and accessibility by the public, the establishment of effective governmental oversight needs to be undertaken...
Related Articles
By Nicholas Wade, The New York Times | 04.30.2026
“J. Craig Venter” via Wikimedia Commons licensed under CC by 2.5
J. Craig Venter, a scientist and entrepreneur who raced to decode the human genome, died on Wednesday in San Diego. He was 79.
His death was announced by...
By Jonathan Basile, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 04.29.2026
WILLIAM BATESON, a foundational figure in the science of genetics at the turn of the last century, once recounted the response of a Scottish soldier to one of his public lectures: “Sir, what ye’re telling us is nothing but Scientific...
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick , Heredity | 04.20.2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it...
By Staff, GMWatch | 03.28.2026
Following a recent podcast interview we were asked whether there is any solid scientific research looking at how gene expression or molecular composition in genetically modified (GM) plants differs from conventionally bred plants. As this is an interesting and important...