Clinical Pharmacologists Warn of DTC Genomics Backlash on PGx
By GenomeWeb,
GenomeWeb News
| 07. 22. 2009
The American College of Clinical Pharmacy has called for federal oversight of direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies, which it believes could inadvertently hold back advances in clinical pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic testing.
In a position statement published in the Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, ACCP argued that consumer response to genetic testing advertising could have "both immediate and long-term effects on public health and the future adoption of pharmacogenetic/genomic testing."
The paper explains that consumers could be let down or confused by the performance of DTC genetic tests, which could have a negative impact on other genetic testing firms that do not market directly to consumers.
The ACCP likened consumer ads for genetic tests to those for prescription drugs, which are regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration's Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications. The group noted that a similar oversight system is not yet in place for the young genetic testing field.
"Given the rate of development of genetic testing and its widespread availability and accessibility by the public, the establishment of effective governmental oversight needs to be undertaken...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...