Branstad Signs Bill Widening DNA Sampling to Misdemeanor Cases
By AP,
Associated Press
| 05. 16. 2013
DES MOINES (AP) — People convicted of certain aggravated misdemeanors in Iowa now will be required to submit DNA samples.
Gov. Terry Branstad signed into law on Wednesday afternoon a measure that expands the collection of DNA samples beyond felony convictions and sex offenses.
“It builds on the current success of our DNA program by using modern technology to help solve and prevent crimes,” Branstad said. “Law enforcement will be able to identify criminals quickly and get them off the streets sooner and convict them with greater accuracy.”
Under the law, adults convicted of such crimes as aggravated misdemeanor assault and theft will submit a DNA sample. Previously, only convicted felons and sexual offenders were required to submit samples. The new law doesn't apply to convictions that happened before its passage.
Deferred judgment cases and misdemeanors related to hazardous waste, agricultural production and gambling are exempt from the DNA requirement. Traffic offenses are also exempt unless a person has three operating while intoxicated convictions in 12 years.
Samples will be added to the federal DNA database, called the National DNA...
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
By Jacob Bogage, The Washington Post | 09.03.2025
The conservative group behind the Project 2025 governing playbook for President Donald Trump’s second term is set to propose sweeping revisions to U.S. economic policy meant to encourage married heterosexual couples to have more children.
The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing...
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 08.21.2025
Less than two weeks after an Alabama Supreme Court decision upended in vitro fertilization in the state and prompted a national backlash, over 100 conservative congressional staff members and I.V.F. skeptics crammed into a meeting room a few blocks from...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 08.23.2025
For Erica L and her husband, in-vitro fertilization was the “nuclear option”.
After two years of trying to conceive, Erica and her husband had no idea why they could not have a baby. Doctors said only that they had “unexplained...
