Biopolitics, Mythic Science, and Progressive Values
By Marcy Darnovsky,
Progress in Bioethics: Science, Policy and Politics; edited by Jonathan D. Moreno and Sam Berger (The MIT Press, 2010)
| 10. 16. 2009
When bioethical deliberation confronts human biotechnologies, it often faces novel questions that recent technical developments have conjured into existence. Many of these biotechnology-related situations are both socially consequential and, at least in some respects, unprecedented in human experience. After spending its first years considering these issues largely as a scholarly endeavor with practical applications in human research and medical practice, bioethics in recent years has ventured far beyond academic and clinical settings.
Among the bioethical issues that have of late become topical are cloning and stem cell research; regulation of the assisted reproduction industry; "designer babies" and the prospect of a market-driven "techno-eugenics;" sex selection and disability de-selection; surrogacy and reproductive tourism; patents on life and markets in kidneys, eggs, and other human tissue. Formerly the province of philosophers, physicians, and lawyers, these topics are now frequently discussed in mainstream media, popular culture and electoral politics. They are matters of interest to entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and global industries. They have captured the attention of policy makers, political consultants, and candidates; of philosophers, ministers, and rabbis. They are subjects for social...
Related Articles
By Jennifer Takhar, Carolyn Wilson-Nash, and Chloe He, BioNews | 06.22.2026
Imagine wanting to have a child and discovering, at every stage, that the system was not designed with you in mind. This is the reality for many LGBTQ+ people in the UK who seek fertility treatment each year.
Our study...
By Isabella Cueto and J. Emory Parker, Stat | 06.11.2026
WASHINGTON — A pledge to “Make America Healthy Again” earned Robert Kennedy Jr. his job atop U.S. health agencies a year and some change ago. He’s now had the opportunity to turn his words into action, with mixed results.
“All one...
By Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 06.04.2026
Scientists at Columbia University have edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented accuracy, an achievement that could open the way to babies engineered with particular characteristics.
The prospect has fueled controversy for years. On the one hand, the...
By Alexandre Piquard, Le Monde [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 05.22.2026
"If proven to be safe, we believe preventive gene editing could be one of the most important health technologies of the century." This is how Lucas Harrington explained the goal of his company Preventive: to create genetically modified babies. Trying...