Biopolitics, Mythic Science, and Progressive Values
By Marcy Darnovsky,
Progress in Bioethics: Science, Policy and Politics; edited by Jonathan D. Moreno and Sam Berger (The MIT Press, 2010)
| 10. 16. 2009
When bioethical deliberation confronts human biotechnologies, it often faces novel questions that recent technical developments have conjured into existence. Many of these biotechnology-related situations are both socially consequential and, at least in some respects, unprecedented in human experience. After spending its first years considering these issues largely as a scholarly endeavor with practical applications in human research and medical practice, bioethics in recent years has ventured far beyond academic and clinical settings.
Among the bioethical issues that have of late become topical are cloning and stem cell research; regulation of the assisted reproduction industry; "designer babies" and the prospect of a market-driven "techno-eugenics;" sex selection and disability de-selection; surrogacy and reproductive tourism; patents on life and markets in kidneys, eggs, and other human tissue. Formerly the province of philosophers, physicians, and lawyers, these topics are now frequently discussed in mainstream media, popular culture and electoral politics. They are matters of interest to entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, and global industries. They have captured the attention of policy makers, political consultants, and candidates; of philosophers, ministers, and rabbis. They are subjects for social...
Related Articles
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
By Emma Cieslik, Ms. Magazine | 11.20.2025
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
By Emily Glazer, Katherine Long, Amy Dockser Marcus, The Wall Street Journal | 11.08.2025
For months, a small company in San Francisco has been pursuing a secretive project: the birth of a genetically engineered baby.
Backed by OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman and his husband, along with Coinbase co-founder and CEO Brian Armstrong, the startup—called...